Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Storm Duration

Status
Not open for further replies.

z8e

Civil/Environmental
Jan 28, 2005
15
Hello,

I want to model a 100-year, 1-hr storm because that is the event that the jurisdiction requires that we size the basins for.
However, using SCS distributions all I get are 24-hour storms. In one place I read that "each [SCS] curve contains depth information for events of ALL durations up to 24 hours." In another I read that the "SCS 24-hour storms are designed for a specific duration" and that "although HydroCAD allows the duration of any storm to be changed, this should only be done with storms that are specifically intended for this purpose."

Anyway, at the moment I have a Type II, 24-hr storm in my settings with a storm duration of 1 hour. Does that sound appropriate?

Thanks.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Compressing a 24-hour storm to one hour will increase the relative peak by 24x, so this is probably not what you want to do.

Please check the regulations carefully. If they specify the SCS/NRCS runoff method, they should also tell you which rainfall to use. For a 1-hour rainfall, they need to specify the exact rainfall distribution. For example, NJ has a 2-hour "water quality" distribution.

If you can't identify the distribution (and you're sure they're not talking about the Rational method!) then you could select the "Constant Intensity" storm in HydroCAD.
 
I guess I have two goals here. One is to demonstrate that with the proposed basins, I have enough capacity to store the 100-yr 1-hr event as determined by the rational method, as dictated by the state. I don't use hydrocad for that process, it is a pretty simple set of calculations and spits out a required volume at the end.

What I am using hydrocad for is to demonstrate that the various pipes, ditches, etc have the capacity to handle the flows, and specifically the basins. There are four basins, tied to each other with pipes, so there's a lot of interaction, with dynamic tailwater conditions on the basin pipes. For that reason I am using the dynamic SI method. For consistency, I am wanting to use a 100-yr 1-hr event but that doesn't sound correct for reasons listed above. There is no specified 1-hr distribution of which I am aware.
(The local jurisdiction is not sophisticated with stormwater regs and defers to the state standard).

Any comments would be appreciated.
 
Sizing a pond based on rational method really isn't recommended. As discussed in many other threads, rational method is designed to give peak flows, but is marginal (at best) for estimating runoff volume. But if that's what your regulations require...

If you want to run an additional SCS analysis, then I suggest you use the appropriate 24-hour SCS rainfall distribution for your area, (Type II, III,etc) together with your 24-hour 100-year rainfall depth. Since the 24-hour rainfall distribution includes all events up to 24 hour duration, you don't need to run a separate analysis for the 1 hour event.

If you want to stick with a 1 hour duration, then you could use the constant intensity distribution with a duration of one hour, but I don't really recommend this approach.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor