Assuming the coating will be applied at ambient temperature / room temperature, I don't think it is expecting too much to require the Contractor or Supplier to provide a letter from the Manufacturer that the proposed coating is suitable for the intended application at continuous service temperatures between 23 degrees C & Max (???) plus 10 degrees C.
Contractors & Suppliers may find a temperature ratings on a data sheet and not really understand what the result implies. Likewise, the dilatants & plasticizers in a coating may not be stable at "continuous" elevated temperature and migrate out of the coating causing embrittlement, crazing or crack/shrink. Some coatings, (epoxies) might undergo a post cure phase that is beneficial. Some coatings will soften to a state of toughness, while others might easily be damaged by otherwise mild (typical) physical abuse. An elevated temperature could change the water absorption rate.
There are manufactures with R&D who confidently write such letters, companies that are too buried in bureaucracy to write these letters and companies that won't because they don't know (Compounders w/o R&D). There may be some exceptional companies to too buried in bureaucracy to write these letters but if they are, then if later a claim is generated, they will also handle it a a glacial pace.