TX - Thanks for the response.
I'm not trying to suggest ignoring minimums I'm just trying to make sure I understand the code. It's one thing to know it, it's another to understand it. Anyway, let's see if I have this correct:
Walls - minimum reinforcement is on both faces to control crack width on both faces. Is this due to the fact of load reversal?
Basement walls - if in a retaining condition, either cantilevered or propped, should follow minimums presented in Chapter 10 (for flexural members) and because this is not a slab or footing, T&S is not required by code. If they are foundation walls with equal earth pressure both sides, by ACI 318, it appears they do not require any reinforcement although (2) #4 or #5 Top and Bottom (in this area) are commonly provided.
Cantilevered retaining walls - For the stem design this should follow chapter 10 (flexural members) but would not require, by code, T&S steel because it is not a slab or footing.
TX -
You make a point that in basement walls, that are subject to minimums for flexural reinforcement, may require reinforcement in both directions. What are you alluding to here?
Also T&S may be required in some retaining walls to control cracking on the face, is there a particular case that you are referring to?
I think essentially what I'm trying to understand is that if the wall is acting more as a flexural member (usually in the case of some sort of earth retention with loading in one direction) do the minimums of Chapter 14 (Walls) apply or should Chapter 10 apply along with 14.3.3 (minimum horizontal steel). I think this will be somewhat more clear if I can understand why they are applying the minimum steel to both faces - just to control cracking on both faces, or is it more due to load reversal.
Thanks again!
EIT