Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


PE Film CD Treated to 42 dynes - lost the CD T in less than week!?

PE Film CD Treated to 42 dynes - lost the CD T in less than week!?

PE Film CD Treated to 42 dynes - lost the CD T in less than week!?

Dear Sirs,
Many times in the past we manufactured the same Flame Retardant film for our customer, CD treated in the range of 42 to 45 dynes. Film is used for lamination to paper cardboard. Customer never had problem to laminate our film in their process.
The last production run of the same product (under same condition and using same equipment and same basic resin, no slip additive) wasn't trouble free. We experienced problem with excessive water contents in flame retardant additives (Halogen compounds, blended with white masterbatch). Problem was so obvious - holes in the film, caused by evaporated stem of water, and we have to stop production. Technical Reps. from additive supplier has been consulted and supplier agree to immediately replace faulty (high water content Flame Retardant additive).
Upon receiving a new Flame Retardant production resumes. Film was as usual QC check for treatment level and it was found that film hold 42 dynes. Next morning QC reported (using the same sample) that treatment is only - weak 38 dynes and still diminishing to final 36 dynes later afternoon.
This is a small story of our big problem...
After an extensive examination, I have concluded that an excessive water content in  Flame Retardant additive (no so high as in first obvious example, but still present) is major cause for diminish CD treatment. My understanding is that molecules of water (polar), after migrating to PE surface, adversely affect (masking) the introduction of the polar group during the CD oxidation process, to PE surface.
I would greatly appreciate if you could comment my big problem.
Thanks & Regards,

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper – Data Security and Know-How Protection
Our data is constantly exposed to the danger of being intercepted or stolen as it wends its way over global data networks. Data security measures and measures for protecting intellectual property should not, however, first be implemented when data is exchanged – companies must lay the foundation for these measures within their own organization. Download Now
White Paper – Collaboration in the PLM Context
The influence exerted by the Internet of Things (IoT) means that there is a steadily growing need for collaboration in industry. Partners from new industries and areas of application need to be integrated in cross-company business processes to ensure that the lifecycle of smart, connected products can be managed from end to end. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close