×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Building/runway impacts for overhead cranes.

Building/runway impacts for overhead cranes.

Building/runway impacts for overhead cranes.

(OP)
Reviewing section 4.9.3 in ASCE 7-16 states the following:
The maximum wheel loads shall be increased by the following percentages.

Vertical Impact Force:
Monorail Cranes (powered) - 25%
Cab-operated cranes - 25%
Pendant operated cranes - 10%
Hand-geared - 0%

I have been using 25% impact for all underhung cranes in my design work.
But now have been confronted that this is incorrect.
What constitutes Monorail Cranes? Or is the logic that it has a pendant 10%?
Can someone help and clear this up?
Thanks for your time.

RE: Building/runway impacts for overhead cranes.

I'm not sure that I understand your question. Using 25% for all cranes is not wrong though, it at least meets the minimum requirements for powered cranes and goes above and beyond the requirements for pendant-operated bridge cranes and hand-geared cranes. The actual excerpt gives a little more information than what you listed above (mainly that the 10% is only for pendant-operated bridge cranes).



The way I interpret this is that a powered monorail crane (however operated) needs to be designed for a 25% increase while pendant operated bridge cranes need only be increased by 10%.

The commentary also points to a few other references that may go into more detail on this, see excerpt below:

RE: Building/runway impacts for overhead cranes.

(OP)
dauwerda,
Your are right, I should have been more clear.

I have been designing (powered) underhung cranes using 25% impact. Hand geared cranes require no impact adjustment.
Be that they may be a double girder underhung crane or single girder underhung crane, but controlled with pendants still requires 25% impact on design.

It was explained to me that a "Monorail crane" is a monorail beam (singular), thus the name "mono"-rail. So 25% should only be used for monorails.
Double girder cranes that are operated by pendant only require 10% impact design. Whether it is a top running crane or an underhung crane.

I assumed that a crane, double girder or single girder, hanging from the lower flange of the beam should be 25%, thus the "monorail crane" statement.

So I am questioning which approach is correct? Am I right in my assumption?

RE: Building/runway impacts for overhead cranes.

I believe what was explained to you is correct.
A monorail crane consists of a single stationary beam that a crane trolley can travel lengthwise on (so it only has one axis of travel). A bridge crane, whether single girder or double girder, allows for the lifting device to travel up and down the girder (or "bridge") part as well as forward and back on the runway beams on either end of the girder (so it has 2 axes of travel). See this link for a more thorough explanation: https://www.mazzellacompanies.com/Resources/Blog/w...
It sounds to me like you have an underhung bridge crane. If it is pendant operated you can use the lower 10% impact force increase.

That said, I have seen more and more bridge cranes getting installed with both pendants and remotes, which would require the 25% increase for structure design. An owner may want to change a pendant operated crane to remote operated (or at least add the remote option) in the future as well, so it may be best practice to always use the 25% as you have been doing to allow for future changes without requiring structural modifications.

RE: Building/runway impacts for overhead cranes.

(OP)
Thanks so much for your response dauwerda, I do know some states do require 25% for underhung cranes.

RE: Building/runway impacts for overhead cranes.

A lot of this is based on the travel speed of a crane. If a crane is pendant operated or hand-geared it can only travel as fast as the operator can walk under it. Thus the impact forces are lower as there is less dynamic action. With a cab controlled or remote controlled crane, the crane speed is independent of the speed that an operator can walk under it.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Reshoring Prototyping and Production
In this whitepaper, we'll provide insight into why and when it makes sense for U.S. manufacturers to reshore prototyping and production, and how companies can leverage the benefits of working with local design, prototype, and manufacturing partners during the pandemic and beyond. Download Now
Engineering Report - Top 10 Defect Types in Production
This 22-page report from Instrumental identifies the most common production defect types discovered in 2020, showcases trends from 2019 to 2020, and provides insights on how to prevent potential downtime in 2021. Unlike other methods, Instrumental drives correlations between a variety of data sources to help engineers find and fix root causes. Download Now
White Paper - Addressing Tooling and Casting Requirements at the Design Stage
Several of the tooling and casting requirements of a part can be addressed at the design stage. If these requirements are not addressed at the design stage, lot of time is spent in design iteration when the design reaches the die caster. These design issues lead to increase in time and cost of production leading to delay in time to market and reduced profits for the organization. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close