×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

ACI 530 and unity equation

ACI 530 and unity equation

ACI 530 and unity equation

(OP)
When using ACI 530, if the wall is reinforced you only have to check fa/Fa + fb/Fb <1.0 (or 1.33) for the masonry if the axial stress in the wall is greater than the allowable axial stress if the wall was unreinforced.

If it isn't, you can directly add the axial and bending compressive stresses together and compare to the masonry allowable compressive stress in bending (fa + fb < 0.33f'm).

Can anyone explain the reasoning behind this?

RE: ACI 530 and unity equation

I believe you may be mis-interpreting the ACI 530 Code.

When you are checking the member as reinforced masonry subject to combined bending and compression, the stress state must comply with BOTH a) axial compression portion of stress less than the allowable axial compression stress with factor of safety of 4.0, AND b) combined axial compression and bending compression stress less than the allowable bending stress with factor of safety of 3.0.

RE: ACI 530 and unity equation

Isn't the 0.33f'm giving you the factor of safety of 3?

RE: ACI 530 and unity equation

(OP)
Thanks for the replies,

I tried to figure out this one for a while today and it just seems strange that you can't do the same for unreinforced masonry. Maybe it's something come from tests.

RE: ACI 530 and unity equation

For a reinforced masonry wall {from ACI 530-99):

Subject to axial load - Applied load must be less than Pa (Eq. 2-17 or 2-18).

Subject to bending loads - compressive stress due to flexure must be less than f'm/3 & tension stress must be less than 0.4fy (Sect. 2.3.2.1).

Subject to bending and axial loads - applied load must be less than Pa AND compressive stress due to flexure AND axial load must be less than f'm/3 & tension stress must be less than 0.4fy.

For an unreinforced masonry wall (or you may design a reinforced wall for the following):

Subject to axial load - Applied load must be less than Pe/4 (Eq. 2-15 & 2-11) AND axial stress must be less than Fa (Eq. 2-12 or 2-13)

Subject to bending loads - compressive stress due to flexure must be less than f'm/3 (Eq. 2-14) AND tensile stress must be less than that in Table 2.2.3.2.

Subject to bending and axial loads - applied load must be less than Pe/4, And compressive stress due to axial and flexure must be less than f'm/3 AND axial stress over allowable stress plus flexural stress over allowable flexural stress must be less than 1.

Now, as a addendum, you can use the 4/3 stress increase, provided you are using load combinations from ASCE 7-95 or previous.  If you are using load combinations from after that you may not use the increase as the 0.75 factor is on the loads already.

Sorry for the long post.  Hope this helps.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Integrating the Engineering Ecosystem
Aras Innovator provides multiple options for integrating data between systems, depending on the scenario. Utilizing the right approach to meet specific business requirements is vital. These needs range from authoring tools, federating data from various and dissimilar databases, and triggering processes and workflows. Download Now
Research Report - Simulation-Driven Design for SOLIDWORKS Users
In this engineering.com research report, we discuss the rising role of simulation and the paradigm shift commonly called the democratization of simulation. In particular, we focus on how SOLIDWORKS users can take advantage of simulation-driven design through two analysis tools: SOLIDWORKS Simulation and 3DEXPERIENCE WORKS. Download Now
White Paper - Industry 4.0 and the Future of Engineering Education
With industries becoming more automated, more tech-driven and more complex, engineers need to keep their skills and knowledge up to date in order to stay on top of this wave—and to be prepared for the Industry 4.0 future. The University of Cincinnati offers two online Master of Engineering degree programs designed specifically for practicing engineers. Download Now
eBook - The Design Gridlock Manifesto
In this eBook, you’ll learn 6 ways old CAD technology slows your company down and hear how design teams have put those problems to rest. “The Design Gridlock Manifesto” shares first-hand modern CAD experiences from 15 companies around the world. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close