Some of the large central stations in Texas have outdoor steam turbines and feedwater heaters and pumps, with related small bore piping. No building enclosure, and the only insulation is for protection of personnel and to retain heat for efficiency, and not explicitly for freeze protection. Retrofitting freeze protection for these plants will be a large endeavor.
Another peculiarity is that most plants in Texas are IPP independent power plants and not part of a regulated utility; they bid for power against the utilities, and there are penalties for not providing the power they bid for . If they are not designed for frigid temps and are aware the polar vortex has them in the crosshairs, they do not have to bid for power at that time and might skip penalties.Their incentive to proactively improve freeze protection for 1 week every 10 yrs is just not there.
I am not familiar with the issues related to gas well freeze protection, but I assume the new regulations will require the facilites that contributed to this will need to demonstrate they will be retrofit to provide freeze protection for 5 days at 20F ambient air temp. This is the type of design data that is used to warranty the performance of the freeze protection for external piping systems. Prior to this event, the original design data may have used the NOAA design ambient data for a 97% probable event.
The normal progression for such rare events is to proclaim outrage and assign a commission to legislate changes, but as time goes by interest wanes and nothing happens. There is an alternate narrative re: climate change , and it suggests that the upcoming solar maunder minimum will lead to 20 yrs of a cooling trend , so this event may occur with more frequency then once per century.
"...when logic, and proportion, have fallen, sloppy dead..." Grace Slick