A single seal, with API Flush Plan 02 / 62 would be the most economical option. A stationary metal bellows works well with the Plan 62 (steam quench) as a baffle can be incorporated into the seal design to direct steam flow at the entire bellows I.D. Ideally, you would have a steam jacket around the seal chamber and the quench on the seal to keep this area warm. If you elect to use a API Plan 02 flush (dead-ended seal chamber), then it would be recommended to leave the throat of the seal chamber open to promote more fluid circulation in the cavity. When properly designed with the correct materials, a single seal with the above flush plans can function well in services such as these.
Before you get too far into the seal design, you need to verify with your seal vendor the cavity dimensions you have will accommodate a cartridge seal, single, dual, etc. A dual pressurized system will work but you still need to address viscosity of the proecess fluid at startup as longeron stated. Of course, if you are mandated to limit leakage externally than the pressurized dual may be one of your few options, but the utilities required and installation costs will be much greater than a single. You would still need to address whether or not leakage of your barrier fluid into the process could be tolerated and what type of barrier fluid will be compatible with your process, unless of course you use a pressurized gas seal with steam barrier, which is another option available. I think the dual seals is overkill unless you really need it.
As you can see, many questions to be addressed that can't be given proper justice on the internet. Hopefully the information helps somewhat.