Yes, one comment regarding PWHT. Is the welding for attaching the stainless steel internals to the drum scheduled after the vessel PWHT? Since the 316L series stainless does not require PWHT, I would consider the attachment welds to be completed after PWHT of the vessel to avoid any possible carbide/sigma phase precipitation of the 316L series stainless internals. It is not good practice to have 3XX series SS exposed to the PWHT time at temperature for the P1 material.
I would think, and you have to confirm this with your design, that the attachment welds joining the stainless (P8) internals to the carbon steel vessel wall (P1) would be exempt from PWHT, based on the nominal thickness of the weld deposit.
Second comment concerns the selection of filler metal for attaching the stainless internals to the carbon steel drum. I would give serious consideration to using a nickel-base filler metal like Inconel for these attachment welds. Two reasons; the linear coefficient of expansion for the nickel-base filler metal is between the linear coefficient of expansion for 316L SS and carbon steel reducing thermal stresses across the weld fusion zones. Second reason is the potential for carbon migration resulting in premature failure of the weld fusion zone on the carbon steel side of the attachment weld should the operating temperature of the vessel exceed 650 deg F. A 309SS filler metal is common for dissimilar metal welds. However, over time the carbon will diffuse from the carbon steel side of the fusion zone to the higher chromium weld deposit. To reduce carbon diffusion, a nickel-base filler metal is used.