DC_Engr
Structural
- Jun 6, 2023
- 10
Hi All
Working on a podium job that’s in SDC B. The overall building design is by EOR and our contract is limited to sizing the gravity members including gravity columns at the podium/transfer lever for loads shown on EOR’s structural plans. Interestingly, they have lots of wood walls, bearing on podium slabs and beam, labeled shear walls. However, only gravity loading is called for these walls so no shear or overturning due to seismic or wind is specified on plans. However, at each end of these wood shear walls the drawings require a 10,000lbs hold-down/connections for uplift/bearing loads to be designed by ‘podium engineer’. Would you treat this requirement to apply only to the connection or you would include this seemingly arbitrary 10kip bearing/uplift load in slab/beams design? Note that Some of the member sizes called out in EOR drawings are such that they will need to be made deeper to make things work, so obviously this 10k load will drive up the demand. However, the question is should that connection load demand even be part of member design regardless of its impact to member sizes?
Working on a podium job that’s in SDC B. The overall building design is by EOR and our contract is limited to sizing the gravity members including gravity columns at the podium/transfer lever for loads shown on EOR’s structural plans. Interestingly, they have lots of wood walls, bearing on podium slabs and beam, labeled shear walls. However, only gravity loading is called for these walls so no shear or overturning due to seismic or wind is specified on plans. However, at each end of these wood shear walls the drawings require a 10,000lbs hold-down/connections for uplift/bearing loads to be designed by ‘podium engineer’. Would you treat this requirement to apply only to the connection or you would include this seemingly arbitrary 10kip bearing/uplift load in slab/beams design? Note that Some of the member sizes called out in EOR drawings are such that they will need to be made deeper to make things work, so obviously this 10k load will drive up the demand. However, the question is should that connection load demand even be part of member design regardless of its impact to member sizes?