My 2 cents.
Two issues I have with this design or rather, end product. sometimes the design and end product separate paths due to financial issues.
The emergency spillway seems to be more or less at the same height as the whole area where the parking area is. What bothers me about this.?
1. Whatever water flows downhill in a uncontrolled way, will cause erosion parallel to the mount of water and time period.It is as if somebody decided that there will never ever be a need for water to flow over it. Big mistake when it comes to us nature of harnessing nature. If you do not plan and most important,spend good money on your idea, nature will win,time and time again.
My solution, lower the emergency spillway be two or three feet and side channel it into the main shute. Unless they apply cosmetics all the way down, this will cause problems, if not serious corrosion,still mud into the river,oh,then they need to catch all the fish below again to save them.

)
Main shute. Two issues I have. Not so much volume but the change in angle halfway down. Use specialized methods and remove some of the rock formations, reduce the curve radius, pay attention to energy dissipation and create a proper still basin that do not obstruct the flow from the powerhouse if max water is released.
Will still be miles cheaper then all the money this issue cost up to now,and which can and will repeat itself with their band-aid repairs(quote toe word from a previous poster who nailed it).
Lets just take the evacuation in its own. The loss of income and all other issues and expenses.