I'm confused about the second to last paragraph in the conclusions section. He mentions a utility that eliminated a multi-grounded neutral. It says the new system has no neutral. Since it's not mentioned, it seems like an equipment grounding conductor was not installed (although it seems more likely that the neutral would have been re-purposed). I don't see how that could enhance safety vs. the original MGN. I also don't see what would be wrong with having a neutral that is grounded at one point.
Not relating to the conclusions I am kind of skeptical about the claim about 60% of current returning through the ground. I'm not familiar with the EPRI study cited but I am wondering if something was taken out of context. Looking at the split factor tables in IEEE 80 the claim seems plausible but far from common.
I wonder what the author thinks should be done about line charging currents. Are they not hazardous?
I don't often have time to read the articles in these magazines so I'm not really sure what's par for the course but I was a little surprised to see such an opinionated article on this topic.