Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

IEEE 1584 Equation 4 Units

Status
Not open for further replies.

bdfig

Electrical
Joined
Nov 1, 2012
Messages
20
Location
AU
Hi, in IEEE 1584 equation (4) (page 11) it states "En is the incident energy (J/cm^2) normalised..."

Then in equation (6) E = 4.184*Cf*En(t/0.2)(610^x/D^x)
E is the incident energy (J/cm^2)

and in section E.3.1
Equation (E.1) E= Cf*En*(t/0.2)(610^x/D^x) in cal/cm^2

Is En from equation (4) in J/cm^2 as stated or cal/cm^2?
 
J/cm^2 as stated. cal/J = 4.187 (according to Mathcad - it must be 4.184 according to IEEE ;-))
 
If En is in J/cm^2 and E is in J/cm^2 then why are we introducing the 4.184 cal->J conversion factor.
 
Although the metric unit of energy is the joule, heat is commonly also measured in units called calories (there are about 4.19 joules in a calorie), or in larger units called Calories (note the capital C). A Calorie is 1000 calories, and should always be called a kilocalorie.
 
What I am saying is that IEEE 1584 provides the following formula to convert from normalized incident energy to the actual incident energy:

E = 4.184*Cf*En(t/0.2)(610^x/D^x)

And E and En are both in J/cm^2.

Therefore why do we have a 4.184 factor?
 
Therefore why do we have a 4.184 factor?
So that you can have one equation give the answer in J/cm² and the other equation give the answer in cal/cm². I have no idea why IEEE decided to use one unit in the main standard and another unit in Appendix E, but that's what they did and it's as simple as a conversion factor.
 
Jghrist, ignoring appendix E and only looking at Section 5.3:

En is in J/cm^2 and E is in J/cm^2
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top