Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

generalized spot welds

Status
Not open for further replies.

nanemo

Materials
May 22, 2008
14
Hallo to all

forgive me for the continuous questions

but I'm in trouble...

I've to create 2 attached by spot welds composite plates

ansys offers me two options:

-massless sw, I don't like to it cause I have a lot of node to attach

-generalized sw

about the last option, can I use as nodal component common line between the 2 plates, or only coincident node must be cosidered?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

We had a similar homeworok problem in school. It involved coupled nodes. It's been a while since and I'm a bit rusty so you might want to check the ansys help for further information.
 
tnx for your answer

Ansys help says:

For a spotweld, N1 and N2 are the nodes which are connected by the spotweld. For a generalized weld, input a nodal component name in N1 and leave N2 blank. The nodal component should contain all nodes that are to be included in the generalized weld.


For a generalized weld, coincident nodes are permitted, but CID must be specified when using coincident nodes. EDWELD is not updated after a node merge operation; therefore, node merging [NUMMRG,NODE] should be done before any EDWELD definitions


my problem was the correct nodal component selection

 
Did you create a component of the nodes that will be coupled (welded) by the EDWELD command?
 
yes, I kept the node attached to the 2 overlapped lines belonging to the 2 surfaces to "weld":

SELECT--->LINES--->APPLY---->NODES ATTACHED TO---->LINES---->CREATE COMPONENT---->MADE OF NODES


then I created generalized spot weld

I made a test this morning, it seems to go


Is it the correct way?
 
Are the selected lines just the perimeter of a circle? Would your component miss nodes inside the circle that are part of the weld?

The approach seems fine to me, but I can't claim to be an expert. As with all FEA its a good idea to run a quick hand calc to see if you're results are reasonable.
 
yes, The lines I selected are parts of the perimetres

since I have a lot of node to weld I supposed genrlzd spot weld option was quick and simple, but I was not able to understand the procedure fully


 
damn, I made a test with generalized spot welds like I described above, all ok...then I applied to my model and that's the result:

*** Warning nodal pairs are defined for GENERAL and
COMBINED welds only. NPR is reset to 0. Keyword:
*CONSTRAINED_GENERALIZED_WELD_SPOT

anyone knows what it means?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor