if i am reading this right, you seem to be proposing a cube design of foundation (5*5*5m * concrete mass * G/25m^2) ~125kNM^2.
tower foundations (usually) use pyramid & chimney foundations, which reduces the load imposed by the foundation considerably.
Broadly this design uses the area of the base to carry the compressive load
and the depth of the foundation to cope with any uplift (outer legs on section towers, with significant deviations experience uplift - in the case of broken wires and wind - a lot of uplift)
when considering uplift the mass of a fustrum of soil extending from the edges of the base of the foundation out at an angle of 30 degrees up to fgl is added to the mass of the concrete. thus
base area - manages compression
depth - manages uplift.
a recent HDD crash resulted in the loss of all of my foundation spreadsheets etc. but i have copies at work....somewhere
to your original point about rebars - as far as i'm aware (and that aint far in the case of reinforcement) i believe that reinforcment (usually) takes the form of a cage.
alternatively augered foundations can be used, or even multiple augered foundations with a pile cap - these definately have cage reinforcement.