joebk
Mechanical
- Mar 15, 2007
- 61
I am working on the design of a machined casting. Tertiary datum used to position some machined features is a cast hole. I think it is appropriate to use tertiary at MMC but I do not want to add the cast hole size and tolerance to the machining drawing unless I can't avoid this.
Currently we typically do restate the dimension and tolerance of a cast feature when it is used as a datum but I am not in love with this practice (two controls for same feature on different drawings).
I would tend to think that if the datum is a feature of size on the machining drawing and is modified at MMC and no tolerance or dimension is given one should refer to the casting drawing but I am unsure (and I don't know if this will work in my little world).
I might be stuck sticking with our current method but I though I would ask if anybody has any advise. Thanks!
Currently we typically do restate the dimension and tolerance of a cast feature when it is used as a datum but I am not in love with this practice (two controls for same feature on different drawings).
I would tend to think that if the datum is a feature of size on the machining drawing and is modified at MMC and no tolerance or dimension is given one should refer to the casting drawing but I am unsure (and I don't know if this will work in my little world).
I might be stuck sticking with our current method but I though I would ask if anybody has any advise. Thanks!