Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations JAE on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Column Reinforcing

Status
Not open for further replies.

ToadJones

Structural
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
2,299
Location
US
I know this has been a dead horse topic here.....

I am reinforcing a column (beam Column) with flange coverplates.
The column needs more flexural capacity.

I'd like to avoid using continuous welds.

The moment is concentrated at the top....imagine a pin-pin column with a concentrated moment at the top.

I'd like to hear others approach for engaging the coverplate and how far to continuously weld the coverplate at the top before I go to an intermittent weld.

I am inclined to design the end continuous weld for MQ/I with "M" being the full allowable moment capacity of the section.


 
Are you driving the load directly into the cover plates or does the load need to get from the column into the plates?
 
needs to get into the plates
 
Provide enough weld at the top to fully develop the plate, then go to intermittent welding.

BA
 
Seems like there is still some life left in it...
Assume that conc mom at top is the only loading present.
I believe the formula for the total force in the weld is VQ/I.
In this case V is constant for the full length of col....now what??
There are two design inputs:
1/ What length of col requres this reinf....then add to this a
development length(aka BA's suggestion).....this is similar to
splicing a beam, but only looking at 1/2 of the splice.
2/ As BA suggested use cont weld to fully develop the cover pl and
then go to itermittent weld ...the size and spacing as per code
to ensure stability of pl., etc.
 
It should be 12MQ/I. See WillisV's response in thread507-160349

 
slick-
I think the "12" there is a built in unit conversion, so it is the same as my MQ/I, no?
 
I always come back to just provide enough weld at the ends to fully develop the plate in tension (agree 100% with BA). It usually just isn't that much weld. I guess it can be conservative in some cases, but it also provides future flexibility to use to full capacity of the section and are not trying to calculate a load that is limited by the welds of a reinforcing plate to the WF.
 
Yea, the plates are 1/2" x 5" on both flanges.
Full yield would be 0.5" x 5" x 36 ksi = 90 kips per plate.

With a 1/4" weld, I'd only need 90kip/ (0.928 kips/in * 4) = 24"
Divided by 2 for fillets both sides and I'm looking at 12" of weld.

Agreed?
 
Yes, agreed. Just as an aside, I typically wouldn't go less than 12" anyway. Just kind of a feel-good number for me (even if the numbers work to be smaller).
 
You could probably use 1.392 instead of 0.928.
 
How is the end moment applied to the builtup section?

BA
 
as an eccentric load on the column....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top