Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

CMS analysis in ANSYS Workbench 14.0

Status
Not open for further replies.

MartinDU

Structural
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
1
Location
DK
Hi,

I have a question regarding CMS analysis in ANSYS Workbench 14.0. I really hope that one of you experts out there can/is willing to help me.

I've tried normal substructuring (Guyan) and obtained the expected results in a modal analysis. Now, since the Guyan reduction yields significant deviations for most eigenmodes, I would like to try CMS. I've chosen a simple system, namely a 3-element cantilever beam:

|------o------o------o

I want to find the eigenmodes for this full model system by condensating the midmost element to a superelement, i.e. obtaining:

|------o SE o------o

The two midnodes are defined as remote points.
I have done the procedure in analogy to the Guyan reduction, i.e. first I have generated the superelement. This is done in a separate analysis on the basis of only the midmost element (the one transformed to superelement):

o------o

The two nodes are defined as remote points in the model. The generation command is (partially copied from a tutorial):

/FILNAME, BEAM2
/SOLU
/COM
NSEL, S, NODE, 1001 , N1
NSEL, A, NODE, 1002 , N2
M, ALL, ALL
ALLSEL, ALL
CMSEL, ALL
NUM_MODES = 100
/SOLU
ANTYPE, SUBSTR
SEOPT, BEAM2, 2
CMSOPT, FIX, NUM_MODES, 0, 100000
ESLN, S
SOLVE
FINISH
SAVE

Strangely, this doesn't result in an error as it did when using Guyan reduction (another command of course). But it generates a .sub file I've tried to use in a analysis of the reduced model (the one with the superelement in the middle). The usage command is:

/PREP7
ET,500,MATRIX50
TYPE,500
MAT,1
SE,BEAM2
FINISH
/SOLU

This command is taken from my Guyan reduction procedure. The analysis goes through, but I obtain completely wrong eigenfrequencies.
Can anyone tell me where my error(s) is/are? It would be highly appreciated.

Kind regards,
Martin Ulriksen
Student in structural engineering, Aalborg University, Esbjerg, Denmark.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top