Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

bond-breaker vs tilt-wall rebar ?? 7

Status
Not open for further replies.

boffintech

Civil/Environmental
Joined
Jul 29, 2005
Messages
469
Location
US
Am an inspector (not EOR) on some work on a tilt-wall project. I have not asked the EOR about this yet but will if needed. No tilt panels have been poured yet. Thirty to 40 are under construction. The contractor is using Maxi-Tilt as the bond-breaker between SOG and tilt-panels. It says right in the Dayton instructions "Do not spray on reinforcing steel." But regardless I'm apparently the only one on the project that thinks it a bad idea to spray the reinforcing steel with the bond-breaker. Do I have it all wrong?
 
There is controversy about the effect on bond, as noted in this thread. But there should be no mistake that applying a "bond breaker" is considered "having material deleterious to bond." From a purely code-compliance aspect, you should never allow reinforcement to be coated with oils or factory bond breakers. This thread was discussing the real world implications.

In a thin slab, layers of unbonded bar will create shear planes that negatively affect performance.
 
If the "Tilt-up Concrete Association" tells its members not to do something, I don't see why a design engineer would allow it. After all, the organisation represents a group of contractors, who are always looking for cost-saving measures.
 
I agree, hokie. So the recommended practice is:

Always remove the reinforcement and apply bond breaker to the form slab.

BA
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top