Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

AWS d1.1 /RT acceptance criteria

Status
Not open for further replies.

bhart192

Civil/Environmental
Feb 6, 2006
81
help: according to Fig 6.2 for a 1" weld the maximum indication can be just over 5/16" , however if there are two indications at 1/8" in size they can't be closer than slightly over 1" , doesn't seem to make sense , i can have a indication 5/16" in size but not two 1/8" indications closer than 1" am I reading the chart correct.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Bhart,

That is how I read it. AWS D1.1 is very strict on adjacent indications. The only wiggle room would be if the two 1/8" indications are separated by less than 1/16. Then you could call them a single indication < 5/16 in size.

JR97
 
Don't overthink it. These are empirically derived rules *that work*. There are many thousands of man-years of experience in using this Accept/Reject criteria, and it works.

But I agree, is seems counterintuitive. In a few years [decades?], somebody will apply Fracture Mechanics to the D1.1 and D1.5 criteria. Expect a LOT of changes then, generally towards accepting larger flaws. Mild steel is very 'forgiving'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor