Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Air India 787 crashes on take off 3

LittleInch

Petroleum
Joined
Mar 27, 2013
Messages
22,922
Location
GB
A full 787-8 has crashed shortly after take off in ahmedabad.

Basically barely got off the ground then look like its trying to land in this video.


Specualtion that they pulled flaps up instead of gear up and basically didn't have enough lift so it looks like a gentle stall right into a built up area.

Looks to be flaps up, slats/ nose flaps down and gear down which is very odd.
 
Last edited:
"and we now know a 787 engine will not keep running with loss of electrical power, as pre-FADEC engines were capable of doing"

Where did this get stated or confirmed?

I'm not saying you're wrong, just I haven't seen anything that states this with any certainty.
 
I don't think it does die. But it just stays as it is with fuel flow.

You need to use the fuel valve to stop it running or flood it with water
 
My memory is the information was contained in the B787 ME&AV Type 1 Training Manual. Link is posted again below, but document has been removed.

EEU controls fuel valve in 787, and FMU controls fuel metering. How are those functions performed with total loss of electricity or control communications? Falisafe mode appeared to be spring loaded fuel shutoff valve, open when energized. Previously it is documented in 2015 that messages caused rollback of dual engines after 248 days of not powering down.

Interesting side note is the removed training manual was from a Chinese training site. 🤔

 
Last edited:
If a control system is using PWM to manage fuel flow it's not going to flow any fuel if power is lost.
 
Just watched the latest Maximus Av video on the water leak. I don't know how credible the guy is but he does not know the meaning of "potable water'. See 2:37 in the vid.
 
Apparently the fail condition is dependant on the aircraft type manufacturer.

Cfm56 is case in point apparently.
 
What is the ideal fail condition? Off, idle, 50% power, 80%, 100%, last valid input?
 
When you lose electro-hydraulic power to FMU, where is electrical power coming from to hold or move electro-hydraulic fuel metering servo to any failsafe position? Would it likely be the spring mechanical pressure closing the fuel shut off valve? Would think in case of engine fire, fuel shutoff valve is immediate way to starve engine of fuel.
 
What it was it was set at by some.

To be honest i don't really know what cause's them to fail. With cross talk the other side will manage the live engine if its shut down as far as i can tell. Its 6 chanels need to die.

Personally I really don't know what the best idea is.

I don't like the idea of the engine dies, unless i want it too and I am ready.
 
When you lose electro-hydraulic power to FMU, where is electrical power coming from to hold or move electro-hydraulic fuel metering servo to any failsafe position? Would it likely be the spring mechanical pressure closing the fuel shut off valve?
Thats how it works in 787. I don't know about other types boeing. Airbus it stays how it is you have to manually close the fuel valve to get rid of power.
 
I don't like the fact that the 787 FADEC engine controls does not have battery backup, like apparently Airbus does. Boeing never expected loss of all 6 generators at once, but it happen in Japan years ago, due to the 248 day power on messaging fault. This time it could be water leaks took out common core processing/control of airplane by short. Common Core processing control goes down, everything fails, whether water induced or software induced. The Common core design without water protection designed in, could be next FAA mandated design change?

I don't coneider water dam floor tape as mentioned in FAA's AD's to be an adquate robust water protection method for critical common core system.
 
I wonder if the same fadec philosophy is the same on other Boeing types.

Ie what's it do on the max with it's 1960's electrical system which they are having to change to get the max 10 certified.
 
But in reality in Japan and India, all 6 generators likely did not fail. Rather the Single Point Failure Common Core System is likely root problem in both cases.
 
Where did this get stated or confirmed?

I'm not saying you're wrong, just I haven't seen anything that states this with any certainty.
Video Summarization of loss of electrical power, results in loss of fuel to engines, and references listed. Some of same data already posted above. But visual version for lazy readers. 😉

 
Capt Steeeve has a pretty good vid on recovering black box data.


At least I thought so :)
 
WARNING. THIS REPORT IS FAKE AI GENERATED.

But it might be being used by those not knowing to justify their opinions. And has been circulating for a few days

A number of incorrect items.

Flight was to Gatwick, and it wasn't raining at take off...

It also didn't go into the ground at an angle of 58 degrees....

 
Last edited:
I have heard about O-Ring leaks of Jamco toilet fixtures on 787s, but this is first I have seen/heard, or remember seeing/hearing, about galvanic corrosion of bathroom fixtures. This could potentially cause a sudden increase to the 8 ounces/hour rate of just O-ring leaks....... galvanic corrosion issues has to be handled by systems requirements and systems integration, and quality control.

"Boeing 787 Lavatory Issues"​

"Boeing 787 aircraft are facing a safety concern with their lavatories, according to a recent FAA proposal. The agency has identified corrosion problems on lower fitting assemblies of Jamco family 95/96 lavatories caused by galvanic interaction between aluminum and carbon fiber components in the wet lavatory environment.

This corrosion could cause lavatories to break free during high g-force events, potentially injuring passengers and crew or blocking emergency exits.

The proposed Airworthiness Directive (AD) would require airlines to inspect the affected components for corrosion, record findings, make necessary repairs, and update maintenance programs to include regular inspections.

The directive would affect approximately 159 U.S.-registered Boeing 787-8, 787-9, and 787-10 airplanes."


"Background"​

"The FAA has received reports indicating corrosion on one or more of the eight lower fitting assemblies and adjacent lavatory components on the Jamco family 95/96 lavatories caused by the galvanic interaction of aluminum and carbon fiber as a result of the wet environment at the lavatory. This condition, if not addressed, could cause the lavatories to break free from the lower mounts during an event with high g-forces, resulting in potential serious injury to passengers and crew or a displaced lavatory blockage that prevents egress through the aisle and exits."


NOT TO PLACE all blame on Boeing as aircraft maintenance after production is key part of air safety. Here is link with video showing what appears to be leaking condensation from the air conditioning system. Likely due to lack of maintenance.

 
Last edited:
Flight AI 171: Indian Authorities Reportedly At Odds With US, UK & France Over Crash Investigation https://share.google/PLBXwpIb0HUqDrtKz

Doesn't sound pleasant.

That liquid isn't a leak as such but does indicate a different issue with the cabin environment control. Basically that fluid was frozen in the hull insulation and has just defrosted and not gone to the lower vent valves.
 

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top