Shanman_
Structural
- Oct 25, 2017
- 18
For a cantilever retaining wall supported on drilled piers, a Geotechnical Engineer on a previous project stated that the active pressure should be considered over 1x the pier diameter below the depth of excavation - continuing all the way to the bottom of the pier.
On a current project of ours, the Geotech states that the passive pressure given to us is "net" and thus active pressure can be discontinued through the depth of embedment. We are skeptical of this verbiage. The report also lists passive pressure as an ultimate value and recommends that the Structural Engineer determine an appropriate safety factor - atypical from what we've seen as well.
The experienced folk here are explaining that active pressure doesn't make sense below grade for X number of reasons.
I did some research for CALTRANS & NYDOT retaining wall examples, sources I hope I can rely on, and found that both agencies consider active pressure taken throughout the length of the pile.
If I were to have it my way, I would consider active pressure a tributary width equal to the pier spacing above grade with a tributary of 1x pier diameter below grade. However, this has a dramatic impact on the required depth.
Any thoughts on the topic would be appreciated. Whether or not active should be considered in this region or about the concept of "net" passive or anything else.
Thanks!
On a current project of ours, the Geotech states that the passive pressure given to us is "net" and thus active pressure can be discontinued through the depth of embedment. We are skeptical of this verbiage. The report also lists passive pressure as an ultimate value and recommends that the Structural Engineer determine an appropriate safety factor - atypical from what we've seen as well.
The experienced folk here are explaining that active pressure doesn't make sense below grade for X number of reasons.
I did some research for CALTRANS & NYDOT retaining wall examples, sources I hope I can rely on, and found that both agencies consider active pressure taken throughout the length of the pile.
If I were to have it my way, I would consider active pressure a tributary width equal to the pier spacing above grade with a tributary of 1x pier diameter below grade. However, this has a dramatic impact on the required depth.
Any thoughts on the topic would be appreciated. Whether or not active should be considered in this region or about the concept of "net" passive or anything else.
Thanks!