Can you not take multiple smaller test samples through surface. Not so many labs have tensile testers that are able to perform testing on such a full size specimen.
Prior to my employment with a gas utility, 316 was specified for bare riser piping but had a 4" long PE sleeve at one section of the riser. Leakage was found in locations where high chloride content water was used. Crevise corrosion primarily under the sleeve and at locations where stones were...
We have had clients who specified additional NDT after hydrotest - not the same as required by Code prior to hydrotest. These requirements were only required for heavy wall PVs like hydrocrackers.
There have been a number of reports/studies published by EPRI on this subject. I believe they are still free. There has been much research published with regard to P91 and its manufacture and heat treatment and welding thereof.
I limited it to 2 and then required a full cut out and reweld. Excessive surface decarburization was the main reason plus over tempering. In one instance I required pipe spools to be cut out and reheat treated in vacuum furnaces after evaluating microstructure.
I would require it for backgouging of welds in heavy wall thicknesses prior to making the opposite side weld. The existing weld is under stress even if intermediate stress relief or dehy heat treating has been performed.
You are comparing apples to oranges. The manufacturers data is full size all weld metal tests performed to maximize grain refinement. Yours are subsize specmens with weld metal dilution with base material with probable lesser controlled heat inputs.