×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Welcome Tips for Sizing a Pump MiniFlow Line?

Welcome Tips for Sizing a Pump MiniFlow Line?

Welcome Tips for Sizing a Pump MiniFlow Line?

(OP)
Can anyone please help in sizing/specifying a pump mini flow line?

The pump is in service, I have the pump spec sheets, know the pump normal operating conditions and have the vendor's recommended continuous minimum flow. Full capacity is required at times, therefore a control valve is desired over a orifice.

Questions that come to mind;

Recommended velocity through pipe (e.g. 3-5 fps)?
Any preferred type of control valve (i.e. make, model, flow characteristics etc.)?
How much over design to include in valve sizing?
Any special requirements for pipe configuration (e.g. minimum distance from pump discharge/suction etc.)?
Any other suggestions you may have!
Any good references that may be of help?

Thx Brian

RE: Welcome Tips for Sizing a Pump MiniFlow Line?

I use a much higher velocity for sizing a minimum flow line
   - you are going to take the pressure drop across the valve anyway, putting in a larger pipe to reduce line losses just increases the dP for the valve.
   - minimum flow is usually not a continuous operation, thus again a higher velocity is used.

The upper limit for me would be 125% of the common erosion limit  100/(density, lb/ft3)^0.5.  If your fluid is dirty or has abrasive material in it (catalyst fines for example), you might want to use a lower velocity.

3 to 5 ft/sec is fine for a pump suction line, it's small for a recirc line.

I try to always route the minimum flow back to the tank or suction vessel to allow the heat of pumping to be dissapated.  If you go directly into the pump suction, and sometimes you have to, you will have problems on continuous recirculation if the heat of pumping can't be dissipated to the atmosphere and I've never been able to get much heat losses through those lengths and sizes of piping.

I doubt I would 'oversize' the valve much over what the vendor has recommended.  Get involved with the instrumentation person who is specing the valve, look at your conditions (no net forward, all flow through recycle at the vendor's recommended amount) and then see for the valve you select what it will pass wide open.  If it will pass another 30% or so, I'd say that is sufficient.  If you oversize the valve, you just make it potentially more difficult to control the bypass valve as net forward flow increases, causing the bypas valve to close.  At some point, it's going to be just off the seat giving you poor control, you want to make sure that operation isn't where you expect/need to operate but that you will simply pass through that point either to no recycle (forward flow will increase) or higher rates of recycle (less forward flow).

As for the type of valve, it depends on the head of the pump, the type of fluid, is it clean or dirty?  Can't answer with the information you've provided.

RE: Welcome Tips for Sizing a Pump MiniFlow Line?

You have flow curves and the pump is in service.  The pump supplier must have given a min flown requirement also.  follow this requirement, there is a margin in it.

I agree with TD2K, avoid going in the suction, if you cannot avoid that try to go as far upstream of the suction as you can to reduce turbulence and to avoid vapor bubbles that might have formed during the expansion over the recycle valve from entering the pump suction.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close