Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Silly question regarding instability in ETABS 2

Status
Not open for further replies.

LinhLe

Civil/Environmental
Joined
May 1, 2018
Messages
3
Location
AU
Hi guys, I'm sure this is a very basic/silly question but I couldn't figure it out myself.

I have a simple model as attached. When I run it, it always says "MAXIMUM NUMBER OF NULL STEPS REACHED FOR CASE: ~P-DELTA SUBSEQUENT RESULTS WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE" and doesn't show any results.

Any help or suggestion to locate the problem is much appreciated.

Regards.
 
 https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=6876176e-8484-4cd2-bda4-b808035e37ee&file=Model_TheBestOffice_Exampl2.ebk
I don't have access to an ETABS license right now - but does your model run fine without P-Delta effects active?

For regular instabilities - switching the analysis solver to the "Standard Solver" typically helps you locate the instable nodes. I haven't investigated a P-Delta failure, however if this is a simple model it may not take too long to check.

You may also for some reason or another just need to add more steps to your P-Delta analysis, or your model is simply too flexible and the P-Delta is breaking it.
 
Thank you,

My model is just a 2x4m concrete wall, 0.3m thick, fixed at base bears 2kN horizontal (as shown in the image).
I ran without P-delta but it says the model is unstable (as shown in the log). I don't quite understand how that happens.
Capture_mqy1fl.jpg
 
Under the Analyze tab - try setting your active degrees of freedom to just the plane in the direction of your horizontal load and the elevation.
 
I was thinking that EZ - but it seems weird that it would be found unstable without P-Delta considering the base has fixed connections. Wouldn't this technically be 3-dimensionally stable? I could see P-Delta causing issues with the low out of plane bending stiffness, but a linear run should come out as stable if that was the issue.
 
Yeah, I haven't tried 2D analysis but I think 3D should work as it's fixed at base.

Could you please have a look into the model and might see what I've missed. Thank you.
 
 https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=127b260c-7f9e-415a-92de-d33d80f17de7&file=Model_TheBestOffice_Exampl2.ebk
Not an ETABS person, but what are constraints for the 4 elements? Are they acting as 1?
 
I guess that's true Bulb - are your elements modelled as membranes or shells? That could be it
 
Luceid said:
I was thinking that EZ - but it seems weird that it would be found unstable without P-Delta considering the base has fixed connections. Wouldn't this technically be 3-dimensionally stable? I could see P-Delta causing issues with the low out of plane bending stiffness, but a linear run should come out as stable if that was the issue.

Agreed that it should - but I've found that removing layers of complexities is the best way to troubleshoot an issue

And also further agree - those elements being modeled as membranes could lead to an instability.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top