Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Concrete stiffness in slab design at Ultimate Limit State

Concrete stiffness in slab design at Ultimate Limit State

Concrete stiffness in slab design at Ultimate Limit State

While many standards tell to consider the effects of cracking, creep and shrinkage (e.g. CSA A23.3-14 cl.9.5.1 and cl.13.6.2) even at Ultimate Limit State , many designers simply run linear analysis using stiffness based on gross area to design concrete slabs.

I did some tests on CSI SAFE and found that the difference in terms of moments were small between a linear model and "cracked" model. My "cracked" model used linear loads case based on stiffness at the end of a non-linear case. This non-linear case used loads from Dead + Superdead + 0.25*Live. I did not consider creep and shrinkage. The modulus of rupture fr was 0.6*sqrt(f'c).

So do you consider cracking in slab design at Ultimate Limit State on finite element model ?
If yes, how ?

Thanks for yours comments

RE: Concrete stiffness in slab design at Ultimate Limit State

You need to consider what the purpose of the analysis is. Non linear analysis generally means that extra moments, shears due to deflection are incorporated rather than having to use magnification factors or similar base on axial load.

For slab axial loads are generally low so the difference between the analysis at ultimate limit state will be low assuming similar cracked stiffness solutions are used. However newer programs like the nonlinear for sale deflections were stiffness changes greatly affect the outcome.

Overall because nonlinear, stiffness are calculated at SLS most will carry the same to ult.

RE: Concrete stiffness in slab design at Ultimate Limit State

The linear elastic solution gives the upper bound for the design of plates or any other reinforced concrete member and is thus a safe option. As far as I know, there exist no reasonably accurate methods for estimating the bending stiffness of istotropic (classic thin plate of constant thickness) or orthotropic (e.g., plate model that includes reinforcement inertia) reinforced concrete plates. Therefore, it should not come as a surprise that concrete plates are modeled by linear elastic methods in ULS.

In fact, determining the bending stiffness of simple concrete beams has also proven to be quite difficult - the reduced inertia properties (due to cracking) and reduction of young´s modulus (creep) are almost always overestimated or underestimated. Reinforced concrete design is not an exact science.

RE: Concrete stiffness in slab design at Ultimate Limit State

A bit late to the party, but the Australian standard (AS3600) recommends reducing the effective bending stiffness by the following amounts:

I'd be wary about using results from ULS analyses that have used uncracked section properties since they may over/underestimate forces/stresses, especially at or around transfer beams.

That being said, I can't really see any benefit from using creep and shrinkage effects on ULS. Unless we're talking bridge girders, the effect of force redistribution due to creep/shrinkage should be minimal.

RE: Concrete stiffness in slab design at Ultimate Limit State

Thanks for yours comments.

Using these reduction factors from AS3600 (who are by the way similar to those in ACI-318-19 cl. affects the moments around transfert beams and edge column, way more than with my non-linear analysis.

The relative stiffness between elements seems the most important.

Maybe that calculating the inertia with the equations given in cl. gives closer results to my non-linear analysis.

Anyway, I would wish that Canadian code would be more explicit on this aspect.

RE: Concrete stiffness in slab design at Ultimate Limit State

Globally reducing the entire slabs moment of inertia will ultimately reduce the overall column/slab joint stiffness which for all but the first interior span will mean larger positive(span) moments and reduced negative(support) moments. The Exterior column will tend to see a larger unbalanced moment. With unreduced properties the negative(support) moments will tend to be larger as well as the unbalanced moment transferred to the support.

A true non-linear analysis will lie somewhere between these extremes as portions of the slab shell and column crack.

My Personal Open Source Structural Applications:

Open Source Structural GitHub Group:

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close