Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

True Position for hole pattern with just one datum

True Position for hole pattern with just one datum

True Position for hole pattern with just one datum


Is it ok, if I use True Position tolerance for hole pattern and use only one datum "A" that is placed on an axis?

These holes are not particularly responsible, they serve only for mounting purposes therefore no perpendicularity to the "B" datum is required really. However, I'm not sure if just one datum is sufficient for that kind of tolerance.

RE: True Position for hole pattern with just one datum


the axis of datum A would be so short, that it is for sure sane to "fix it" via datum B.

In other words, do |B|A| Datum Reference Frame.

For something else to comment, provide whether your drawing is following ISO or ASME world.

Speaking of which, you might also want to adjust dots and commas for number separation. Either one or the other.

RE: True Position for hole pattern with just one datum

Hey, thanks for the reply!

This part is just an example that I found among old files. My question is rather about general principle - does a single datum placed on an axis (provided its length is reasonably large) suffice in similar cases, where I want just to control position of a feature and don't care much about orientation? I'm asking specifically about cases, where I deal with circular pattern of holes on a round part (e.g. flange)

RE: True Position for hole pattern with just one datum


You said you don't care about orientation, but you do likely care about [u,v] ie: rotation about the x and y axes respectively (assuming x and y axes are in plane with B and z is perpendicular to B), just not necessarily orientation/clocking about the z-axis aka [w] rotation. Position tolerance also controls both orientation AND location of each hole axis to within the stated tolerance. This may all be intuitive, but I just wanted to clarify that when you say you don't care about orientation, you are likely only talking about one form of orientation (rotation about the z-axis).

As mentioned above it is important that our datum features are robust for simulation ie: the low length to diameter ratio of A could potentially make it unstable/unreliable as a primary datum feature but we also want to make sure our datum features reflect part function/design intent. You mentioned the example of a flange, which could also be your textbook example - if A is a clearance fit and is secured with a series of bolts the clamping force will tightly pull your surface B in contact with the mating part surface. In this case your datum feature B is likely the best candidate for the primary datum feature as it will constrain your rotation [u,v] and translation [z] in practice, and then A can be specified secondary to constrain [x,y] translation/location.

Your position tolerance can have one datum feature. It can even have no datum features (datumless). Whether or not that "suffices" is up to the designer and what the design intent is.

RE: True Position for hole pattern with just one datum


Think of your datum features as the means with which you will immobilise your part. As cr7 points out, your datum A feature is short enough that it will not control rotation. The datum B face should be your primary datum feature.


Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close