## Plate Deflection: FEM vs. hand calculation

## Plate Deflection: FEM vs. hand calculation

(OP)

I'm trying to compare the FE results with a hand calculation but I'm not having great luck yet.

I have a plate, 300 mm x 300 mm, (aluminum 72,000 MPa, v=.33), thickness 3 mm. An homogeneous pressure of 0.005 MPa is applied all over the plate. THe plate is fixed at every edge.

The FEM model gives me a max deflection of 1.81 mm at the center of the plate while a formula from Bruhn gives me a max deflection of 0.92 mm (the formula is wmax = (alpha x q x a^4)/(E x t^3) where q is the pressure, a is the edge length. alpha depends on the boundary condition and for a fixed edge it's 0.0438

Thogths?

I have a plate, 300 mm x 300 mm, (aluminum 72,000 MPa, v=.33), thickness 3 mm. An homogeneous pressure of 0.005 MPa is applied all over the plate. THe plate is fixed at every edge.

The FEM model gives me a max deflection of 1.81 mm at the center of the plate while a formula from Bruhn gives me a max deflection of 0.92 mm (the formula is wmax = (alpha x q x a^4)/(E x t^3) where q is the pressure, a is the edge length. alpha depends on the boundary condition and for a fixed edge it's 0.0438

Thogths?

## RE: Plate Deflection: FEM vs. hand calculation

## RE: Plate Deflection: FEM vs. hand calculation

Link

## RE: Plate Deflection: FEM vs. hand calculation

I made a model in FEM of an aluminum (2024) plate, 300 x 300 mm2, thickness of 1 mm. The plate has rivets at three edges and the fourth is free. An homogeneous pressure of 0.0336 MPa is applied all of the surface. I used a plastic curve to model aluminum. I get a displacement of 86 mm at the center of the plate! Stress is only 361 MPa. I cant' understand if in reality the plate would deform that much or I'm missing something.

There are the values I used for the plastic curve

e s

0 0

0.00457 331

0.01524 376

0.03549 409

0.1 448

## RE: Plate Deflection: FEM vs. hand calculation

## RE: Plate Deflection: FEM vs. hand calculation

There are the data:

length = 1050 mm

height = 300 mm

thickness = 1 mm

Pressure = 0.0336 MPa

Now, the plate is riveted on the bottom edge and the two lateral edges but free to move on the top edge (easy to see that from the deformed picture). The plate is also riveted vertically to create three subplates. You can simplify the model with a single plate 300 mm tall and 1050/3 mm long and apply a third of the pressure. The mid subplate was modified with a stringer so forget about the deformation in that area.

Thank you

https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=...

https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=...

## RE: Plate Deflection: FEM vs. hand calculation

## RE: Plate Deflection: FEM vs. hand calculation

1. For a linear analysis, the assumption is sin(theta)=theta (small deformation assumption). However, as this assumption changes, so can the result. This will also depend if the force is a "follower force" or not (meaning the angle of the force changes with the deformation).

2. There is something called "stress stiffening" (incorporated by the geometric stiffness matrix - aka differential stiffness matrix). The classic example is the membrane of a drum. As it deforms out-of-plane, it becomes more and more difficult to increase the out-of-plane deformation. The geometry changes, the membrane (in-plane) stresses increase, and the out-of-plane deformation becomes more difficult to increase. The opposite case is a that of a column with an imperfection/perturbation. That said, I don't understand why your case shows an increase of deformation (I would have expected a reduction - though I have not looked at it closely).

Brian

www.mystran.com

## RE: Plate Deflection: FEM vs. hand calculation

## RE: Plate Deflection: FEM vs. hand calculation

SWComposites: I'm using SOL 106.

## RE: Plate Deflection: FEM vs. hand calculation

If you want us to look further, please provide the input file.

DG

## RE: Plate Deflection: FEM vs. hand calculation