×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Joist Loaded on “Wide” Face

Joist Loaded on “Wide” Face

Joist Loaded on “Wide” Face

(OP)
Hi everyone,

I have a situation where a contractor wants to use a 2X8 on the flat for a header over a new opening in an existing concrete wall. I am calculating the moment resistance of this 2X8 on the flat, and I am not sure what specified strength to use (in Canada, so using CSA 086). Table 6.3.1A is for structural joists, which is what I would normally use for a joist loaded “normally”. Should I still be using the same specified strength for the joist on the flat? I see that for Table 6.1.3C (beam and stringer grades), there are reduction factors for beams loaded on the wide face. These reduction factors are not mentioned in Table 6.3.1A.

Thanks!

RE: Joist Loaded on “Wide” Face

Woody1515,

Is this 2x8 actually seeing any load or is more like a buck frame around a door or window opening???

Is it acting as a lintel over a masonry opening? What kind of load is it actually carrying?

Is it carrying any more loading than that which is not supported by arching action?

A sketch or elevation view would be helpful.

Jim



RE: Joist Loaded on “Wide” Face

I'd imagine for sawn (natural) timber that the same strength properties apply irrespective of the direction of bending.

Manufactured wood products like glulam or LVL often have different characteristic strengths for bending on the flat.

RE: Joist Loaded on “Wide” Face

Tabel 6.3.1A is joist and plank. this would be considered plank orientation. so you can use the numbers from that table directly.

But, In this application will it be in direct contact with concrete? If so, you'll want to use PT lumber. And I believe 2x8 PT lumber is incised, so you need to take that reduction into account.

All in all, I think that's a terrible idea. Put in a real lintel. a couple of 2x4 will be infinitely stronger than a single 2x8 on flat.

RE: Joist Loaded on “Wide” Face

(OP)
Thanks everyone. I went ahead and designed a lintel instead, I’m not sure how I missed the joist and plank values.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now
The Great Project Profitability Debate
A/E firms have a great opportunity to lead the world into the future, but the industry’s greatest asset—real-time data—is sitting wasted in clunky, archaic ERP platforms. Learn how real-time, fully interactive dashboards in a modern ERP allow you to unlock data that will shape the future of the world. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close