×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

AS/NZS 1170.2:2011 - 4.4.2 Hill-shape multiplier

AS/NZS 1170.2:2011 - 4.4.2 Hill-shape multiplier

AS/NZS 1170.2:2011 - 4.4.2 Hill-shape multiplier

(OP)
The hill-shape multiplier has the greatest effect on site wind speed of all the site exposure multipliers (up to x1.71), yet the standard does not offer much guidance on how to calculate the value. I would appreciate finding out how others arrive at calculating this multiplier.

1. How do you decide the height (H) of the hill, ridge or escarpment when the terrain is complex (i.e. foothills or multiple peaks)?

2. How do you select the "most adverse topographic cross-section within the range of directions within 22.5 degrees on either side of the cardinal direction being considered" (See clause 4.4.2), given that there are theoretically infinite cross-sections within the sector. Any methods?

RE: AS/NZS 1170.2:2011 - 4.4.2 Hill-shape multiplier

1. Refer to the commentary, there is a procedure recommend in CL C4.4.2 that could be applied.

2. Look at the values you need in the formulas and calculate it out. It should become apparent what drives the result (generally its the steepness of the top slope height of H/2, so relationship of Lu and H matter as this flows through into L1 and L2 values). Search for the worst case of this condition within your sector.

RE: AS/NZS 1170.2:2011 - 4.4.2 Hill-shape multiplier

(OP)
Thanks for the response Agent666, however:
1. "AS/NZS 1170.2 Supplement 1:2002" is now withdrawn, and AS/NZS 1170.2:2011 has no commentary.

2. I fully agree, however this may be a time consuming process when H is redetermined for each cross-section, by a method like you referred to from the old supplement (As mentioned in 1.).

RE: AS/NZS 1170.2:2011 - 4.4.2 Hill-shape multiplier

There is software that can help make these easier checkwind is one such software.

http://www.nceng.com.au/
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close