×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Reinforcement Spacing in Concrete Walls

Reinforcement Spacing in Concrete Walls

Reinforcement Spacing in Concrete Walls

(OP)
Hi all

First time poster. Been using previous posts for info for forever!

Question is this: if ACI 318 (7.6.5) and CSA A23.3-2014 both limit reinforcement spacing to 3x the wall width maximum, why do Logix and FoxBlocks tables permit spacing well beyond this? How do they do it? FoxBlocks even has technical bulletin: 1.05.06 which reinforces this. I'm in Canada so we have to abide by CSA standards and don't have the ACI and IRC competing against each other. But from what I can tell, the IRC allows spacing beyond this as well (even though it is supposed to parallel ACI-318). And in reading the commentary for 318-11 it actually says (in regards to 7.6.5.) that using spacing larger than the minimum may be desirable.

RE: Reinforcement Spacing in Concrete Walls

I think you have to keep in mind that FOXBLOCKS (and previously separate company Reward Wall Systems) play in both the IBC and IRC worlds (non-residential and residential).

Their tables are perhaps for residential homes, basements, etc. When using IFC systems, we always design to ACI 318 and ignore those tables.

RE: Reinforcement Spacing in Concrete Walls

(OP)
Thanks JAE (what an honour to have such a vet leave my first reply!)

I admit I let a little confusion creep in: IBC vs IRC.
Up here we have the NBC and it covers both.

Does the IRC not have such a requirement for limiting reinforcement to 3x the wall width?

I am specifically referencing residential concrete walls.

RE: Reinforcement Spacing in Concrete Walls

Quote:

Does the IRC not have such a requirement for limiting reinforcement to 3x the wall width?
I'm not sure as we don't do a huge amount of IRC type work and when we do we tend to get all geeky with it and design as we usually do...with contractor complaints that the walls are "over-engineered".

Our firm actually used to develop the Reward Wall system tables years ago.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Implementing a Multi-Domain System
IoT systems are multi-domain designs that often require AMS, Digital, RF, photonics and MEMS elements within the system. Tanner EDA provides an integrated, top-down design flow for IoT design that supports all these design domains. Learn more about key solutions that the Tanner design flow offers for successful IoT system design and verification. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close