×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Torsional functions - Derivatives
5

Torsional functions - Derivatives

Torsional functions - Derivatives

(OP)
I've come across these torsional functions, for rotation in a member, from an AISC publication "Torsional Analysis of Structured Steel Members". Appendix C contains the functions for the angle of rotation for different support conditions.
Has anyone seen the functions for the derivatives of the angle θ (θ', θ'', θ''')?

RE: Torsional functions - Derivatives

They are likely from AISC Design Guide #9 on Torsion.

Dik

RE: Torsional functions - Derivatives

(OP)
Thank you very much to both for this publication.

RE: Torsional functions - Derivatives

Assuming theta is a function of Z, a lot of the complicated terms are just constants relative to z, so I think the derivatives would work out easier than it might look.

RE: Torsional functions - Derivatives

(OP)
I have been through these charts based on the documents in this post.
The discrepancies I wanted to bring up include the following (see attached):
- Case 5 (θ''): My results are similar for the larger values of L/a but there is a discrepancy at smaller values. For L/a = 1, tabulated max is -0.14 and I get about half of this.
- Case 8 (θ'): Similar to above, my results tend to increasing discrepancy as L/a approaches zero.
- Case 8 (θ'''): My results are out by a factor of 10 compared to the literature. Is it possible the latter is missing a factor of 10?
- Case 11 (θ''): I think there is an error in the formula for the second derivative.

The literature from AISC did have at least one mistake, in Case 3 (θ), the original values have been overwritten.

Can someone please verify my results for Cases 5 and 8.

RE: Torsional functions - Derivatives

(OP)
Does anyone have any experience with this?

RE: Torsional functions - Derivatives

LR11 - I'm actually gearing up to write a paper on torsion, and the design guide and associated technical note will play a big part in that. When I get into it I'll try to review the points you've brought up and see what I can figure out.

RE: Torsional functions - Derivatives

(OP)
Sure no worries, we can compare data in due course.

RE: Torsional functions - Derivatives

Definitely case 11 is incorrect, as you've proposed it should be a negative sign (output from Mathematica):-

Note you can simplify further to be in a similar form to the AISC equations by factoring the 'a' terms and recognising that sech=1/cosh.

I did a small writeup here

I wonder for some of the other cases if AISC kind of screwed things up in case 5 in plotting due to the weird scale in the attachment you provided, where by the first division is 0-0.15 and the other divisions being the same vertical height but only 0.05 between divisions? Seems like a potential error to me?

RE: Torsional functions - Derivatives

don't know what occured at the end of that post with the attachments. There are no attachments. Can't seem to edit it out.

RE: Torsional functions - Derivatives

Case 8 derivatives also seems correct (the same as AISC versions), no factor of 10 in there sorry.

RE: Torsional functions - Derivatives

Case 5 derivatives also seem correct (the same as AISC versions)

RE: Torsional functions - Derivatives

(OP)
Thanks for spending so much time on it, and confirming the error in case 11.
With respect to cases 5 and 8, and the differences between my plots and the curves supplied in Appendix B: I re-plotted and have the same outcome as in post "23 Feb 20 12:48" ... it wasn't the derivatives I was questioning in these instances.
- The subtle difference in Case 5 (θ'') and Case 8 (θ'): Who knows?
- The factor of difference in Case 8 (θ''') : The plot axis shows θ''' x (GJ/t x a^2/L) ... my suggestion was that it should be θ''' x (10GJ/t x a^2/L).

The observation that there was an inconsistent plot scale in Case 5 (θ'') & the AISC amendment for Case 3 (θ) may suggest that some plots have errors in them.

RE: Torsional functions - Derivatives

Hi LR11

It doesn't take much time at all to run them through Mathematica.

Yeah you'd tend to think their plots have some errors in the case of the derivatives being validated as being correct. The other option is that the original angle formula being started from may be wrong!

I did just note they have recently updated the errata for DG9. https://www.aisc.org/publications/revisions-and-er...

This includes a revision to the original angle formula for case 11 to:-


They also have updated case 5 graph for the 2nd derivative which is one of the cases you are comparing, which compares much better with your graph:-


For case 8 page 77 bottom graph the graph is actually now noted as being for:-

So you are right it is out by a factor of 10.

Check out the latest errata as there are a few other errors noted for other cases you haven't mentioned.

So on the balance of probabilities I'd imagine you have it correct, and they are probably wrong. I'd feedback any of the errors you think are there to AISC. Reality is most people have probably just plugged and chugged and not actually checked the formulas as you have!

Updated derivatives for case 11, note subtle changes in 1st derivative and sign change in 2nd and 3rd derivatives compared to previous result:-

RE: Torsional functions - Derivatives

(OP)
Thank you again for advising of the errata list.
I will go through the others amendments as well.
Cheers.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

eBook - Manufacturing the Cars of Tomorrow
In this ebook, we'll explore how additive manufacturing is going to transform the way cars are made. This includes commentary from thought leaders such as Ford's CTO, Ken Washington, Customer case studies of ways 3D printing is being used today, and a variety of part examples where 3D printing is already impacting how automobiles are made. Download Now
White Paper - Smart Manufacturing for Semiconductor
New technologies and approaches present great opportunities for semiconductor manufacturers to achieve high levels of innovation, yield and improvement. This white paper explores some of these cutting-edge technologies and how they can be applied effectively in the semiconductor industry. Read about how Smart Manufacturing is transforming the semiconductor industry. Download Now
White Paper - Analysis and Simulation in Aircraft Structure Certification
Organizations using simulation and analysis tools effectively see the benefits in their ability to achieve certification faster and with drastically less total cost than those who do not maximize these tools. Read this White Paper to learn about how digital tools such as analysis and simulation help in aircraft structure certification. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close