Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Learning pressure vessel DBA using ANSYS MECHANICAL

Learning pressure vessel DBA using ANSYS MECHANICAL

Learning pressure vessel DBA using ANSYS MECHANICAL

Dear all,

I am new in the forum, very interesting place I have found :)

I am learning how to do a DBA using ASME BVPC Sect.VIII code. I created my own vessel to work with, and after a few analyses I have a couple of questions:

1. I realised that at least 4 failure modes are identified by the code. Based on screening criteria, my vessel dimensions and characteristics excluded it for a fatigue calculation. In any case, ratchening is mandatory. So I carried out a static analysis in ANSYS Mechanical, with a load-unload condition (t=1-Pressure=0, t=2-Pressure=Pmax, t=3-Pressure=0, t=4-Pressure=Pmax....and so on). I have very low plastic strain (so I guess this criteria is not fulfiled according with that is said in the code). A chart of max.stress, max.deformation, volume....exhibits a constant trend after a couple of cycles(I mean, for example, t=2-max.stress=1e+08, t=4-max.stress=1,001e+08....t=10-max.stress=1,01e+08...). Is this enough to guarantee the bessel is safe against ratchening? If not, what criteria should I follow for determine properties are not varying with cycles? Sorry if I am not explaining this well.

2. I used a static structural analysis as a pre-stress condition for Eigenvalue Buckling, in order to determinate the load multipliers. I found all of them with negative values. I think I undersatnd the physical meaning, but, how is this translatred to the norm criteria? Should I choose absolute values? Or should I deactivate the "Include negative multiplier" option in Anaysis Settings? I choose 4 modes to find, is this enough? Is there any rule of thumb to guess this number of modes? I guess the deformation contour plot has no physical meaning, is that correct?

Many thanks in advance and I apologise if my english is not good enough...I am glad to become a aparto of this interesting community!

Kind regards,


RE: Learning pressure vessel DBA using ANSYS MECHANICAL

Charas - for me, anyways, we are getting into the realm of going beyond what can be provided, for free, over the anonymous internet.

Do you have mentors? Do you have the ability to take a training course on this topic?

RE: Learning pressure vessel DBA using ANSYS MECHANICAL

Thanks for comment.

Unfortunately, no, I don't (at least at the moment)

If you have a recommendation for training course, please let me know. I will save it for the future.

Any suggestions about my questions?

RE: Learning pressure vessel DBA using ANSYS MECHANICAL

Any of the top four options when you do a google search for "asme section viii division 2 part 5 training" would be good choices.

Regarding ratcheting - remember that it is a failure mechanism about dimensions/displacements.

Regarding buckling - take a look through these forums for discussions on buckling. Regardless - you need the positive eigenvalues to get the mode-shapes. I, personally, would never use an eigenvalue buckling analysis solely, because I have been burned too many times. Most pressure vessel buckling failures are elastic-plastic buckling, which cannot be detected by elastic-buckling alone.

RE: Learning pressure vessel DBA using ANSYS MECHANICAL

Thanks you Mr.Seipp for your kind suggestions to follow your courses. I will consider them for the near future (I cannot pay 2000 dollars now).

And also thank for your comments. I thought my questions were direct and clear (some of them could be answered with "yes" or "no"), anyway I will try to make them more clear the next time :)

I have a couple of papers that can help to infer the answer to my questions. If anybody is interested, please let me know and I will include here the links.



RE: Learning pressure vessel DBA using ANSYS MECHANICAL

I would be thankful if you will be able to share what you have found.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - The Criticality of the E/E Architecture
Modern vehicles are highly sophisticated systems incorporating electrical, electronic, software and mechanical components. Mechanical systems are giving way to advanced software and electronic devices, driving automakers to innovate and differentiate their vehicles via the electric and electronic (E/E) architecture. As the pace of change accelerates, automotive companies need to evolve their development processes to deliver and maximize the value of these architectures. Download Now
White Paper - Model Based Engineering for Wire Harness Manufacturing
Modern cars, trucks, and other vehicles feature an ever-increasing number of sophisticated electrical and electronic features, placing a larger burden on the wiring harness that enables these new features. As complexity rises, current harness manufacturing methods are struggling to keep pace due to manual data exchanges and the inability to capture tribal knowledge. A model-based wire harness manufacturing engineering flow automates data exchange and captures tribal knowledge through design rules to help harness manufacturers improve harness quality and boost efficiency. Download Now
White Paper - Modeling and Optimizing Wire Harness Costs for Variation Complexity
This paper will focus on the quantification of the complexity related costs in harness variations in order to model them, allowing automated algorithms to optimize for these costs. A number of real world examples will be provided as well. Since no two businesses are alike, it is the aim of this paper to provide the foundational knowledge and methodology so the reader can assess their own business to model how variation complexity costs affect their business. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close