Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

AMS-A-22771 penetrant insepction interpretation

AMS-A-22771 penetrant insepction interpretation

AMS-A-22771 penetrant insepction interpretation

Hi all,

First post in a very long time on a new account - lost my old login.

AMS-A-22771 calls out "4.4.5 Prior to penetrant inspection, each forging shall be etched (See 4.4.4), dried (See 4.4.4), and penetrant inspected (See in accordance with ASTM E 1417". ASTM E 1417 indicates that "3.8 Examination Sequence - Final penetrant examination shall be performed after the completion of all operations that could cause surface-connected discontinuities or operations that could expose discontinuities not previously open to the surface. Such operations include, but are not limited to, grinding, welding, straightening, machining, and heat treating."

Ultimately, one division of my company makes the forging and another machines the forging to shape. Whose responsibility is the penetrant inspection? There's a bit of an internal debate over if AMS-A-22771 intends the forging to be penetrant inspected, or if the final machined part should be, and I'm looking for insight.


RE: AMS-A-22771 penetrant insepction interpretation

This is more of a commercial decision rather than compliance issue. Ultimately the supplier whose name appears on PO is responsible for it. Who does it depends on logistics, cost, and shop capability/certification. I have seen it performed by the last shops, forge shops, outside venders, or even customers themselves (parts in as-received condition).

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


White Paper - Implementing a Multi-Domain System
IoT systems are multi-domain designs that often require AMS, Digital, RF, photonics and MEMS elements within the system. Tanner EDA provides an integrated, top-down design flow for IoT design that supports all these design domains. Learn more about key solutions that the Tanner design flow offers for successful IoT system design and verification. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close