×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Design Forces from Response Spectrum Analysis

Design Forces from Response Spectrum Analysis

Design Forces from Response Spectrum Analysis

(OP)
When the modes are combined with various methods (CQC, SRSS etc.) the sign of the displacements and forces are lost within most software, so often when analysing forces due to a response spectrum load case the laws of static are often not obeyed.

I have a shear wall being supported on a transfer structure of two columns. The overturning moment from the lateral displacement should cause compression in one column and tension in another, but the forces under the RSA show both columns going into tension (due to the aforementioned sign loss). I am using ETABS, so there is no apparent option to use the 'sign of the most dominant mode'.

How do you typically determine appropriate design forces from a RSA?

RE: Design Forces from Response Spectrum Analysis

Run an equivalent static analysis beside it, and use some judgement to determine the sign of a given action for a given loading direction. I often find you need to manually review and interpret the static cases to make sure you are interpreting the sign correctly for the response spectrum cases.

RE: Design Forces from Response Spectrum Analysis

So, the challenge here isn't that either of the column forces are incorrect, it's just that their RELATIVE signs are incorrect (or not useful because they're so far removed from obeying statics).

In cases like this there are two things to worry about:
1) Run the response spectra load combinations twice. Once with a positve and negative load factor. That way, you're checking the columns for both tension and compression. Right?
2) Identify cases where the relative signs matter.... maybe if you've got a combined footing that connects the two columns. Then use engineering judgement to determine relative signs. Maybe using Agent 66's idea of using an ELF method to determine relative signs of the two column components when designing that combined footing.

RE: Design Forces from Response Spectrum Analysis

(OP)
Thanks for the responses. I actually just realized when you place the RS load case into a load combination in ETABS, it automatically gives you an envelope ranging from max to min, which is essentially the same as creating the negative load case that JoshPlum suggest.

Cheers

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources

eBook - Efficient and Effective Production Support with 3D Printed Jigs and Fixtures
Jigs and fixtures offer manufacturers a reliable process for delivering accurate, high-quality outcomes, whether for a specific part or feature, or for consistency across multiples of parts. Although the methodologies and materials for producing jigs and fixtures have evolved beyond the conventional metal tooling of years past, their position as a manufacturing staple remains constant due to the benefits they offer. Download Now
Overcoming Cutting Tool Challenges in Aerospace Machining
Aerospace manufacturing has always been on the cutting edge, from materials to production techniques. However, these two aspects of aerospace machining can conflict, as manufacturers strive to maintain machining efficiency with new materials by using new methods and cutting tools. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close