×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

Support for duct bank encased in mat foundation

Support for duct bank encased in mat foundation

Support for duct bank encased in mat foundation

(OP)
I am designing a pile supported mat foundation that must encase an existing duct bank.
The thickness of the mat above the duct bank is not sufficient. Otherwise, I would have ignored the thickness below the duct.
So, I must rely on the thickness of the mat below the duct.
Since the duct bank is existing, I'm planning to support it temporarily with re-bar (or steel) frame, as the soil is excavated below the duct bank.
If I let those frames rest on the soil, there will be no cover leading to possible corrosion of the frames and possibly wider area corrosion.
Therefore, I'm planning to raise the frames on small conc. blocks (+/- 6" x 6" x 6").
Here's t he question:
Are there products made that could be used in lieu of those conc. blocks to avoid having to form and pour a few dozen of those blocks?
I'm assuming by making the blocks with roughened surfaces, they will essentially become integral to the mat and there should not be any
infiltration into the mat that could cause rebar corrosion or concrete degradation. Is that a reasonable assumption?
Thank you.

RE: Support for duct bank encased in mat foundation

Quote:

I'm assuming by making the blocks with roughened surfaces, they will essentially become integral to the mat and there should not be any infiltration into the mat that could cause rebar corrosion or concrete degradation. Is that a reasonable assumption?

Not a good assumption. There may be aggregate interlock, but it remains a cold joint.

Can the duct bank be replaced either permanently using a route that avoids the mat or temporarily until conduit embedded in the mat can be put to use?

The entire proposed concept (encasing an existing duct bank in a structural mat) is very poor practice.

www.SlideRuleEra.net idea

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Considerations for choosing a 3D printing technology
The adoption of 3D printing into major companies’ product development life cycles is a testament to the technology’s incredible benefits to consumers, designers, engineers and manufacturers. While traditional production methods have limitations in manufacturability, 3D printing provides unparalleled design freedom due to the additive method of building parts layer by layer. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close