×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

ISO1940 Standards and high RPM's

ISO1940 Standards and high RPM's

ISO1940 Standards and high RPM's

(OP)
Hi all

I'm currently balancing micro-turbine rotors using 2 plane balancing method. ISO1940 G2.5 requires a quality balance limit of 0.033mm.gram per bearing location in my case (100,000rpm), which I'm finding near impossible. Is ISO1940 limits a bit of an overkill? The best I can physically achieve is an order of magnitude higher (0.33mm.gram).

thanks

Dynaman.

RE: ISO1940 Standards and high RPM's

**** What problems are you having ?

Are you verifying the residual unbalance in the tolerance planes, or the correction planes?

Please Describe your balance machine setup with words and pictures showing bearing configuration and rotor drive.
Are you balancing the rotor assembly, supporting it on the actual bearing journals, or is an impeller etc being mounted on a mandrel?


Also describe the method you are using to determine final residual imbalance . Direct Machine read out, trial weight "proving" , etc.
Do you have a copy of ISO 1940-1 and -2 ? The limitations of repeatability, and the complications of actually achieving finer grades (balancing in service bearings and more) are there for a reason, and are sometimes overlooked by the engineer dictating the notes for the drawing and purchase order.

RE: ISO1940 Standards and high RPM's

(OP)
Hi Tmoose,

Yes I'm verifying residual unbalance in the tolerance planes. Its a home made setup with custom electronics and soft bearing rig. I've calibrated the setup using trial weights and then using influence coefficients to calculate residual unbalance as a direct readout. I have a copy of ISO1940-1, however i'm not sure what you are referring to regarding the last statement?

thanks

Dynaman

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - How ESI is Helping Move New Medical Device Product to Market Quicker & More Cost Effic
Early Supplier Involvement has long been a strategy employed by manufacturers to produce innovative products. Now, it almost seems like a necessity. Because decisions made in the design phase can positively affect product quality and costs, this can help add value to OEM bottom lines. This white paper will discuss many facets of ESI, including why it’s so valuable today, what challenges limit the benefits of ESI, how cost is impacted, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close