×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

# acoustic modal analysis_ Workbench

## acoustic modal analysis_ Workbench

(OP)
Hello!

I'm trying to do an acoustic modal analysis on a vocal tract mesh using Workbench 19. After importing the mesh from ICEM CFD (as .uns) a created a Named selection of the mouth and set a Boundary condition of 0 Pa accoustic pressure in there. I also created an Acoustic body so that the programme knows what body to use (i also set the speed of sound and mass density accordingly).

The goal is to compute the first 6 modes for the vowel /:a (their frequencies). After the calculation, I get 2.-6. mode calculated correctly, but the first mode is way off (see attached pic)(should be somewhere around 650). Any idea what I might be doing wrong?

### RE: acoustic modal analysis_ Workbench

Hi freiwyk,

Can you describe your boundary conditions a little more? How did you get a rigid body mode?

Suggestions:
- In your mode shapes, see if the 0 Pa acoustic pressure was respected. I suspect it is not, thus the presence of 0Hz rigid body mode.
- Since Ansys v18.2, "Modal Acoustics" is native in WB Analysis Systems now without need for ACT. You could give that a shot.
- Have you tried creating a simple room to check your process? (e.g. link)

Kind regards,
Jason

### RE: acoustic modal analysis_ Workbench

(OP)
Hello Jason,

The only things I set were Accoustic pressure in the mouth area to 0 Pa (see attached picture) and Acoustic body as my imported geometry (the entire body).

I'm not sure if the acoustic pressure condition was respected, but I guess not, because the pressure is constant throughout the whole tract in the first mode (see attached pic). The computation is being run on ANSYS 17.2., my mistake.

I think I might be missing a condition somewhere, but I can't seem to find it.

I'm new to both ANSYS and acoustics, so I apologize in advance for any misleading information I might have provided :)

Thanks,
freiwyk

### RE: acoustic modal analysis_ Workbench

Hi freiwyk,

Looks like the P=0 was not respected. Try V19.0 if you can. Otherwise, use a command snippet.

#### CODE --> apdl

cmsel, s, yourNamedSelectionMouthSet
D, all, pres, 0
allsel 

Kind regards,
Jason

### RE: acoustic modal analysis_ Workbench

(OP)
[SOLVED]

Hello Jason,

You were right, it was not respected. Although I still really can't understand the reason behind it, all I had to do was change the Acoustic pressure from 'Named Selection' to 'Geometry Selection' (but still using the exactly same nodes). After that, everything worked like a charm. Nevertheless, it took me quite some time to find :)

Thank you for your time and effort!

Regards,

Michael

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

#### Resources

eBook - Mastering Tolerances for Machined Parts
When making CNC machined parts, mastering tolerances can be challenging. Are general tolerances good enough? When does it make sense to call out for tighter tolerances? Do you need a better understanding of fits, datums, or GD&T? Learn about these topics and more in Xometry's new e-book. Download Now
eBook â€“ How to Choose the Correct Corrosion Testing Method
When designing a metal component, engineers have to consider how susceptible certain alloys are to corrosion in the final productâ€™s operating environment. In a recent study by NACE (National Association of Corrosion Engineers), it was estimated that the direct and indirect costs of corrosion in the United States is approximately 6.2% of the GDP. In 2016, that cost exceeded \$1 trillion dollars for the first time. Download Now

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!