×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Jobs

FEM: 2d analyses with 3d-based code

FEM: 2d analyses with 3d-based code

FEM: 2d analyses with 3d-based code

(OP)
Hello!

I have a question regarding some simulations I need to run.
I have a finite element code able to reproduce 3D problems. With this code I would need to run some analyses by considering a 2D body (in order to compare my results with other results on the same examples run with a 2D-based code).

Does anyone have any similar experience? What assumptions have you done? I was thinking of making a very thin third dimension, and apply plane stress / strain conditions (based on the thickness of the real specimen in relation to the other two dimensions).

Many thanks

RE: FEM: 2d analyses with 3d-based code

If you use a 2D element, you can apply a plane stress or plane strain condition to account for the anticipated behavior in the third dimension.

If you use a 3D element, you do not (can not) apply a plane stress/strain condition to the element. The thickness itself accounts for the behavior in the 3rd dimension.

Brian
www.espcomposites.com

RE: FEM: 2d analyses with 3d-based code

and rotational freedoms at each grid.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

RE: FEM: 2d analyses with 3d-based code

You could use plane strain for finite thickness 3D solid element model, and plane stress for the thin one.

https://welsim.com

RE: FEM: 2d analyses with 3d-based code

I think the point was that 3D elements don't consider plane stress/plane strain, but 2D elements do.

another day in paradise, or is paradise one day closer ?

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources

White Paper: Rapid Manufacturing with FDM
The automotive industry is increasingly turning to additive manufacturing, and fused deposition modeling (FDM) specifically, as a reliable alternative to traditional metal-cutting methods, like milling, turning and boring. Download Now
White Paper: Revolution in Design
Open up new possibilities for your business by changing the way you think about product development. Compared to traditional methods, 3D printing offers advantages that allow you to make more innovative products and get them to market faster. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close