×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Related Articles

Jobs

Existing Purlin Bracing

Existing Purlin Bracing

Existing Purlin Bracing

(OP)
Have the situation of an existing metal building with no documentation and unknown manufacturer. The owner's property insurer wants to verify that the existing 8" Zee roof purlins are adequately braced. The purlins are 24' span @ 5' o.c. with (1) 4" channel attaching the purlin midpoints in alternating purlin bays. They are supporting a standing seam roof and 20 psf snow. For some reason the insurer only thinks this is a concern at the bays along the outer wall and not in the interior area, although they the same roof framing exists throughout.

With limited experience in cold-form steel, I am having trouble determining what direction to take. Even after going through the AISI spec and commentary.

RE: Existing Purlin Bracing

If the brace is connected such that it prevents rotation of the purlins, then the unbraced length of purlin can be taken as 12'.

BA

RE: Existing Purlin Bracing

Prior to the 1996 AISI Specification, many manufacturers assumed that their standing seam roof braced the top flange of the purlin without the use of supplemental braces. The 1996 Spec prohibited that practice and required one of two solutions for purlin design, 1) unbraced length based only on the use of discrete intermediate braces, or 2) running of a "base test" which is a single span test with 2 purlins and the roof panel. That is loaded in a vacuum box in either gravity or uplift loading to determine a capacity. That capacity is then divided by the full braced capacity to determine an R-factor. That R-factor is then used directly in the design as a capacity reduction. This reduction in particular is not a big issue in interior continuous bays because the typical controlling condition is bending/shear interaction at the end of the purlin lap near the support. Depending upon the age of the building it is certainly a possibility that this is functioning under the base test rules and they are needing extra reinforcement in the end bays vs. the interior bays, hence the channels only in the end bays.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Resources


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close