Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


QQ-P-35, type 11 vs QQ-P-35C, type 11

QQ-P-35, type 11 vs QQ-P-35C, type 11

QQ-P-35, type 11 vs QQ-P-35C, type 11

Does anyone know the difference between passivate per QQ-P-35, type 11 verses passivate per QQ-P-35C, type 11? Some of the parts came in looking kind of a gray-black and others the standard silver. I have done some research and found that the specs have been updated and cancelled and updated and cancelled again but I guess I'm just needing to know if the parts are still usable. Thanks for the help.

RE: QQ-P-35, type 11 vs QQ-P-35C, type 11


QQ-P-35A [1968] Lists Type I, II and III...
Type I Low Temperature.
Type II Medium Temperature.
Type III High Temperature
NOTE. Subsequent revisions added more roman numerals for specific passivation treatments for various SSTL [CRES] and HRA materials.

Perhaps what appears to be Type 11 is actually Type II???

I actually prefer to specify AMS2700 Method 2 - Passivation in Citric Acid ... which is applicable to virtually all SSTL/HRA metals...and is "eco-green" for storage/waste disposal.

Regards, Wil Taylor

o Trust - But Verify!
o We believe to be true what we prefer to be true.
o For those who believe, no proof is required; for those who cannot believe, no proof is possible.
o Unfortunately, in science what You 'believe' is irrelevant. ["Orion"]
o Learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist. [Picasso]

RE: QQ-P-35, type 11 vs QQ-P-35C, type 11

If your PO specified QQ-P-35, type 11, which as wktaylor noted is a process that doesn't exist, where did you find a vendor to perform this work? Even though QQ-P-35 is no longer current or used for new design, there are still vendors qualified to perform the process for legacy applications. As for the difference between QQ-P-35 and QQ-P-35C, the vendor should use the latest spec revision unless otherwise instructed.

If your PO specified passivation per QQ-P-35 type II, use of this obsolete process is acceptable for your application, you have a vendor qualified to perform this process, and the vendor supplies a CoC and/or certs stating they performed the work in accordance with the standard, then you can probably go ahead and use the parts.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close