×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
• Talk With Other Members
• Be Notified Of Responses
• Keyword Search
Favorite Forums
• Automated Signatures
• Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

#### Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

# Wind Pressure on Trussed Towers - Distribution Type?

 Forum Search FAQs Links MVPs

## Wind Pressure on Trussed Towers - Distribution Type?

(OP)
We are designing agriculture support towers with a square footprint in RISA. We have calculated our wind pressure (67psf for this 6'x6' footprint) from the formulas in ASCE 7-10 and utilized the Trussed Tower Force Coefficient from Fig 29.5-3. I am a little confused on if the wind pressure is to be distributed as if it were fully cladded (two way/one way distribution in RISA), or just that pressure applied to the exposed area of the column (Open Structure distribution in RISA). The two way/one way seems a bit overkill in my opinion. When I apply an area pressure to one side of the tower using Open Structure, the resulting transient loads end up being a line load of 26plf to all four columns (strange since I would expect it to be just that plane, or only two columns). These are HSS4x4 columns.

Let me know your thoughts on this please.

### RE: Wind Pressure on Trussed Towers - Distribution Type?

The open structure area loads in RISA do apply to all members equally, not just to members in that plane. And, the back frame will get the same loading as the front frame... meaning no reduction for shielding.

When we implemented this feature, there was some wording in ASCE-7 that specifically prohibited the consideration of shielding. The rational being that a small angle to the wind load would mean that the back frames get essentially the same load as the front frames.

I'm not sure that this is how engineers who work with trussed towers and such really do their design. But, that's the code provision we were looking at when this was implemented.

For what it's worth, we have a "user request" to change this or to add an option to only consider the current plane. I'll add your name to the list of users who have requested this enhancement.

### RE: Wind Pressure on Trussed Towers - Distribution Type?

(OP)
Thanks Josh. It was my understanding that one either uses the Open Signs/Lattice Framework coefficient and apply it to leeward and windward columns (coefficient is lower and thus smaller pressures), or use the Trussed Tower coefficient (which results in higher pressures) and only apply it to the windward face.

### RE: Wind Pressure on Trussed Towers - Distribution Type?

I'm not an expert enough on the wind codes to give you guidance. I'd have to pull open the codes to review them. My experience is with the following:
1) Open structure using much, much older codes (ASCE 7-1995)
2) Building Structures using the current ASCE codes
3) Lattice communication towers design to the TIA-G standard

Based on my experience I would guess that your understanding is correct conceptually. But, ultimately you'll have to pull open the code and review it yourself to make sure that it is correct. If I recall correctly, the SEAoW has a design guides / commentary / manual on the wind code that might be useful to you. Haven't looked through it in years. But, when I did, I found it useful.

#### Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

#### Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

#### Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login

Close Box

# Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

• Talk To Other Members
• Notification Of Responses To Questions
• Favorite Forums One Click Access
• Keyword Search Of All Posts, And More...

Register now while it's still free!