Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

POV of Tower Modeled as Single Shell Course vs. Tower Modeled with Multiple Shell Courses

POV of Tower Modeled as Single Shell Course vs. Tower Modeled with Multiple Shell Courses

POV of Tower Modeled as Single Shell Course vs. Tower Modeled with Multiple Shell Courses

I am checking a Compress calculation report and the designer modeled a 50 ft seam/seam tower with just a single shell course instead of multiple shell course, e.g. 5 shell cans that are 10 ft long.

Will the period of vibration be the same?

RE: POV of Tower Modeled as Single Shell Course vs. Tower Modeled with Multiple Shell Courses

Modeling a "run" of cylindrical shells as a single cylinder component may be acceptable for a conceptual model. But it imposes possible problems and limitations for calculations intended for fabrication.

For example, radiography of the additional girth seams is unknown, undocumented, and untreated in the COMPRESS reports. Using only a single cylinder prevents varying the nominal thickness of the shell to account for variations in hydrostatic head, required thickness due to wind or seismic, etc. Other problems may result as well.

However, treating the section of cylindrical shell as a single component does not materially affect the calculated period of vibration of the vessel. COMPRESS calculates the natural frequency using a Rayleigh-Ritz method, with each shell component broken into a number of "slices" to consider the lumped mass. The number of slices results with the POV of the two models (single cylinder versus multiple) being pretty much the same.

Tom Barsh

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Low-Volume Rapid Injection Molding With 3D Printed Molds
Learn methods and guidelines for using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printed molds in the injection molding process to lower costs and lead time. Discover how this hybrid manufacturing process enables on-demand mold fabrication to quickly produce small batches of thermoplastic parts. Download Now
Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM)
Examine how the principles of DfAM upend many of the long-standing rules around manufacturability - allowing engineers and designers to place a part’s function at the center of their design considerations. Download Now
Taking Control of Engineering Documents
This ebook covers tips for creating and managing workflows, security best practices and protection of intellectual property, Cloud vs. on-premise software solutions, CAD file management, compliance, and more. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close