×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

API 2008/2014 New Sizing Method...

API 2008/2014 New Sizing Method...

API 2008/2014 New Sizing Method...

(OP)
Does anyone have any experience with purchasing relief valves with real-gas isentropic flow equations vs ideal flow (cp/cv)?

Do vendors (like pentair and farris) support the new methods outlined by API?

RE: API 2008/2014 New Sizing Method...

(OP)
I apologize, I am referring to API 520 Part 1

RE: API 2008/2014 New Sizing Method...

in my experience in most cases API correlation for gas/vapor based on ideal gas cp/cv returns values not too different from rigorous models,
there are old threads in this forum (2011 ?) reporting results comparing values calculated with rigorous models (the isentropic nozzle model included in Prode Properties) vs. API ideal cp/cv and a method discussed in Hydrocarbon Processing magazine, in many cases results are not too different (except in critical area where a rigorous methos is preferable)
note that you shouldn't enter real cp/cv in correlations based on ideal cp/cv


RE: API 2008/2014 New Sizing Method...

The Safety Relief Valve forum would have been a better place to ask this question. You may want to put a link in the PSV forum pointing to this question to see if you get some more support.

After sizing a PSV using real gas methods, one knows the flow area and coefficient that is required. If the vendor checks the sizing using ideal gas methods, and comes up with a different flow area/coefficient, then there needs to be a technical discussion with the vendor. In my experience, this difference due only to sizing methods is rare. The flow would have to be on the edge of the PSVs capacity for this to happen. I don't remember a single case where this has happened to me.

Good luck,
Latexman

Technically, the glass is always full - 1/2 air and 1/2 water.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Resources

White Paper - Design for Additive Manufacturing
With a growing number of parts manufactured directly by additive manufacturing techniques, it is important to lay down design principles suitable for such manufacturing processes and to ensure parts are designed for additive manufacturing. There are several factors that are to be considered at the design stage. Few such design issues in additive manufacturing are discussed in this paper. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close