×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

ASCE 7- 05/10 Wall Components and Cladding

ASCE 7- 05/10 Wall Components and Cladding

ASCE 7- 05/10 Wall Components and Cladding

(OP)
Referance ASCE 7-10 Fig 30.4-1 (Same in ASCE 7-05 but different section)
The GCp for wall components and cladding may be reduced by 10% if the roof slope is less than 10deg. Does this mean for a GCp of say 0.7 would be 0.7-(0.1*0.7)=0.63 as opposed to 0.7-0.1=0.6 ?

Thanks in Advance

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

Replies continue below

Recommended for you

RE: ASCE 7- 05/10 Wall Components and Cladding

0.63 is what I would think.

RE: ASCE 7- 05/10 Wall Components and Cladding

(OP)
That's what I was thinking as well.

I also double check our software (CSC Tedds) and it looks like that is how they derive it as well.

Thanks.

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

RE: ASCE 7- 05/10 Wall Components and Cladding

Please avoid using too many decimals. The entire ASCE 7 loading scheme is an estimate. Taking it to even one extra decimal place is a waste of time and may unnecessarily complicate the design. Round up, and keep in mind that there is so much variation in things like wind and floor loading, that you can't expect to make a better building with a sharper pencil. We usually end up guessing about and estimating for things like roofing materials, floor coverings fire sprinkler, and HVAC loads, because these aren't designed (or even selected) by the time our work is complete.

RE: ASCE 7- 05/10 Wall Components and Cladding

(OP)
TX- You make a very valid statement. The only reason I'm trying to sharpen my pencil is I'm trying to 'validate' an existing condition.

EIT
www.HowToEngineer.com

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close