a2mfk
Structural
- Sep 21, 2010
- 1,314
I hope the drawing makes this very clear.
I have to attach the panels to help with my shear wall overturning.
These connections will be done using full height embed plates, attached with continuous plates and angles, stitch welded. I have all that worked out.
I have had it driven into my head not to attach two panels together because of in-plane movements due to shrinkage (short term) and thermal/moisture (long term). But in this case, the panels frame together at corners, which can accommodate some movement, and the panels beyond this area have expansion joints and will not be connected (other than top and bottom).
If you think I still should be concerned with this in-plane movement, then a suggestion for the flat plate connection would be great. The angle at the inside return corner should add more flexibility at least in shrinkage since the angle can flex, I will only weld at the outside edges of the legs.
THANKS in advance.
I have to attach the panels to help with my shear wall overturning.
These connections will be done using full height embed plates, attached with continuous plates and angles, stitch welded. I have all that worked out.
I have had it driven into my head not to attach two panels together because of in-plane movements due to shrinkage (short term) and thermal/moisture (long term). But in this case, the panels frame together at corners, which can accommodate some movement, and the panels beyond this area have expansion joints and will not be connected (other than top and bottom).
If you think I still should be concerned with this in-plane movement, then a suggestion for the flat plate connection would be great. The angle at the inside return corner should add more flexibility at least in shrinkage since the angle can flex, I will only weld at the outside edges of the legs.
THANKS in advance.