Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Related Articles


damping ratio (beta) for ASCE 7 gust effect factor calculation

damping ratio (beta) for ASCE 7 gust effect factor calculation

damping ratio (beta) for ASCE 7 gust effect factor calculation

I am looking for clarification regarding the damping ratio (beta) as used in the ASCE 7-05 section 6.5.8.  Accordingly, beta is the "damping ratio, percent of critical".  So, the question is, if your damping ratio is 0.02*[critical damping], or 2% of critical damping, is beta=0.02 or is beta=2.0?

My interpretation is beta=2.0.  My calculated Gf is 0.91.  However, I noticed that a proprietary software package (won't name names) uses beta=0.02.  Hence, their Gf is over 1.90.  Otherwise, our calculations match perfectly.

Curious, does anyone know what ranges to expect for flexible gust effect factors?  Thanks in advance.

RE: damping ratio (beta) for ASCE 7 gust effect factor calculation

See the linked article below, in particular Figure 3.  The Beta to use in calculations is the decimal value (0.02).  1.9 does seem very high though.

RE: damping ratio (beta) for ASCE 7 gust effect factor calculation

thank you Willis!

I have found other sources that also indicate using the decimal value (0.02).  The Gf=1.9 is a direct result of using a very low naturual frequency (default value) of 0.200.  I utilized the equations in the commentary of ASCE7-05 (C6.5.8) and determined a frequency of 0.6.  Resulting Gf is closer to 1.14... MUCH better than 1.9.  Should probably verify with STAAD.

By the way, this was for a tall sign like those found at freeway intersections.  Single steel pole supporting a billboard.

Thanks again.

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close