Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!
  • Students Click Here

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here


Effect of "weak" Vacuum Rings on Vessel MAEP

Effect of "weak" Vacuum Rings on Vessel MAEP

Effect of "weak" Vacuum Rings on Vessel MAEP

Here is something that confuses many people. There is a difference between the MAEP of the cylindrical shell and the MAEP of any vacuum stiffeners that may be present. This seems so self-evident when you understand the calculations, but years ago I had a hard time grasping the concept. Based on our calls and letters over the years I know that many people run into the same conceptual problem. Or sometimes it is their customer, maybe a vessel owner/operator, that doesn't understand this.

For example, the vessel owner may want to re-rate a vessel for higher vacuum and wants to use some existing insulation rings as vacuum rings. What may happen is that the cylindrical shell will check out okay, meaning that based on the new (shorter) value of unsupported length L it has an MAEP sufficient for the desired pressure, but the "vacuum rings" (formerly insulation support rings) are woefully inadequate...meaning that their MAEP is less than the design external pressure and far less than that of the shell. How can this be? How can the shell be adequate with a high MAEP but the rings are no good?

ASME Code provides different rules for determining MAEP of the cylindrical shell and the vacuum rings. The MAEP of the cylindrical shell is based on the length between the "lines of support", and the shell's diameter and thickness. This calculation assumes that the ends...those "lines of support"...are capable of supporting the force imposed on them. Further, the vacuum rings must meet a minimum required moment of inertia that is based on the required thickness (for the given external pressure) of the cylinder and the length of shell that is supported by the stiffener. Thus the required moment of inertia of the vacuum ring is related to the force imposed on the ring from external pressure. The rings act as the "foundation" to support the cylindrical shell. It is entirely possible to have a cylindrical shell with sufficient MAEP rating to be supported by a weak "foundation" that would limit the MAEP of the vessel. In this case the vacuum rings would have inadequate moment of inertia to support the shell at the given pressure.

An interesting thought experiment: consider a cylindrical shell with heads, and a very large stiffener ring at mid-span. Find the MAEP of the cylinder. Now consider the effect on the stiffener ring as it is further and further decreased in size. Eventually a point will be reached at which the ring cannot support the load from the external pressure and will either collapse or buckle.


   "Although this forum is monitored by Codeware it is not intended as a venue for technical support and should not be used as the primary means of technical support."

  Tom Barsh
  Codeware Technical Support

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


eBook - Rethink Your PLM
A lot has changed since the 90s. You don't surf the Web using dial-up anymore, so why are you still using a legacy PLM solution that's blocking your ability to innovate? To develop and launch products today, you need a flexible, cloud-based PLM, not a solution that's stuck in the past. Download Now
White Paper - Using Virtualization for IVI and AUTOSAR Consolidation on an ECU
Current approaches used to tackle the complexities of a vehicle’s electrical and electronics (E/E) architecture are both cost prohibitive and lacking in performance. Utilizing virtualization in automotive software architecture provides a better approach. This can be achieved by encapsulating different heterogeneous automotive platforms inside virtual machines running on the same hardware. Download Now

Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close