×
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

Basics about heat transfer analysis

Basics about heat transfer analysis

Basics about heat transfer analysis

(OP)
Hi all,

I have to conduct a coupled structural and heat transfer analysis. The aim is to calculate displacements in a part subjected to heat sources varying with time. So far, I've never done heat transfer analysises, so I'm looking for some expert input before I calculate rubbish.
My first question would be what elements I should use for the coupled thermal and structural analysis. The choice would be between tetra8 (eight-noded parabolic tetrahedrons) and hexa8/hexa20 (linear or parabolic bricks) elements. I did not include the tetra 4 because of its poor structural performance. The bricks promise to be the "best choice", but as far as I can see now, the geometry can't be easily mapped meshed, so this can be prohibitive for the bricks. How much should the thermal performance of the tetrahedrons be estimated to differ from the brick elements? How much does the parabolic element formulation improve the elements' performance in the thermal analysis?

Secondly, I can't guarantee to be able to create a mesh of very high quality. It may be that there will be a few elements with bad distortion values and/or high aspect ratios. I know that this will compromise the accuracy of the structural analysis. How about the thermal part? Is its the accuracy affected in the same way?

Thirdly, as implied above, I guess I have to performe a transient analysis because the heat sources vary over time at different locations. For a steady state solution, it would be easy to "split" those two analysises in a way, that first the temperature distrubution is simulated and then the displacements/stresses that result from that temperature distribution. Is there a way to equally split the two analysises in case of a transient simulation?

Any help on these topics would be highly appreciated.
Cheers,
Daniel
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login



News


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close