Contact US

Log In

Come Join Us!

Are you an
Engineering professional?
Join Eng-Tips Forums!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

*Eng-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

Posting Guidelines

Promoting, selling, recruiting, coursework and thesis posting is forbidden.

Students Click Here

AEP exchanger design w/ bolted rear channel

AEP exchanger design w/ bolted rear channel

AEP exchanger design w/ bolted rear channel

I am trying to model an AEP class C floating tube sheet single-pass exchanger with bolted-cover type front and rear channels.  The design is a replacement unit.  The original was designed in the '70's, and had the tube-side outlet in the bolted cover of the rear channel.

I believe the answer is 'no', but I'll ask anyway: Is the described design possible to model in Compress with the exchanger module?  It seems that I cannot choose the bolted-type rear channel in this exchanger config.  I seem to have come across a bug where, if i enter most (or all) of the design data, and move 'back' and 'forth' in the process selecting options as below, I can choose a bolted cover and make Compress lock up TIGHT!

The method:
1. Enter all design data but don't click 'finish'
2. Back out to the beginning and choose the 'fixed tube sheet' option
3. Move forward, choose a bolted-type rear channel
4. Back out to the beginning and choose 'floating tube sheet'
5. Now the option for a bolted-type rear channel appears, but is indented to imply an absent parent design option under which a welded cover option appears along with the bolted one.  Keep the bolted option selected, continue through the series of inputs and click 'finish'.

Voila...locked.  It seems I'll just have to hand calc. the config. of the original.  No big deal, but I wanted to bring it to the attention of others as I'm pretty new to using the exchanger module of Compress.  That being said, if I'm doing something wrong in this very vague and general methodology, please tell me.

Thanks gents!


Fitter, happier, more productive

Red Flag This Post

Please let us know here why this post is inappropriate. Reasons such as off-topic, duplicates, flames, illegal, vulgar, or students posting their homework.

Red Flag Submitted

Thank you for helping keep Eng-Tips Forums free from inappropriate posts.
The Eng-Tips staff will check this out and take appropriate action.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Eng-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members! Already a Member? Login


Close Box

Join Eng-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical engineering professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Eng-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close